Can UKA after KineSpring system failure be a viable option? A case report

Main Article Content

Giuseppe Niccoli
Paolo Di Benedetto
Daniele Salviato
Alessandro Beltrame
renato Gisonni
Vanni Cainero
Araldo Causero

Keywords

KineSpring System, failure, complications, revision surgery, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Abstract

Background and aim of the Work: The KineSpring System is an alternative treatment offered in selected symptomatic patients suffering from mild to moderate medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). This device reduces medial compartment loads in the OA knee without compromising the integrity of the lateral or patellofemoral knee compartments, maintaining the normal knee anatomy. Currently, papers about KineSpring System installation show promising results. The current authors describe a case of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) employed to treat medial knee OA after Kinespring system failure. Methods: A 64-year old male patient presented to our hospital after failure of a Kinespring system implantation into his left knee at an external hospital, where the outcomes obtained were not satisfactory. The surgical options discussed with the patient were the TKA or medial UKA. A medial UKA was preferred by the patient. Results: One year from UKA, the patient complained of frequent joint effusions and weight bearing pain despite a good ROM without radiographic signs of implant loosening. Therefore, after two years we replaced UKA with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Conclusions: Further experience is needed to provide reliable clinical data about the results of the UKA after KineSpring System discharge.

a

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract 401 | PDF Downloads 117

Most read articles by the same author(s)