Exploring the adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound (DLUS) by physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists: an updated scoping review
Keywords:
Diaphragm, Lung, Ultrasonography, Physiotherapist, Physical therapist, Respiratory therapistAbstract
Background: The adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound (DLUS) by physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists (“therapists”) to examine and assess the diaphragm and lungs continues to grow. The aim of this updated scoping review is to re-explore and re-collate the evidence around the adoption of DLUS by therapists.
Methods: This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Data sources searched included AMED, EmCare, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PubMed and Pedro. Grey literature sources were searched alongside communication with leading authors in the field. The Participants, Concept and Context (PCC) approach was employed to formulate the research question. A charting form was developed and piloted to extract: title, authors, year of publication, country of origin, professional group involved (population), lung or diaphragm ultrasound (concept), evaluation method, educational, clinical or research setting (context), subject/disease/patient group, sample size, study design and professional group performing DLUS.
Results: 133 studies met all inclusion criteria, an increase of 107 new studies compared to the original scoping review searches 7-years ago. Studies were included from 17 new countries and included 17 new participant populations. Lung ultrasound saw the largest increase in study number with education and implementation emerging as a new area of investigation. Full list of included studies is provided in Supplementary File 1.
Conclusion: The number of DLUS studies involving therapists continues to show international growth with studies investigating an increasing range of participant populations. Published studies now include research on DLUS adoption, implementation, and utility amongst all three of the therapy professions who use DLUS. The potential of DLUS and its direct impact on patient outcomes still needs to be explored further. However, DLUS remains a novel and innovative imaging technique in the hands of physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists as its utility continues to grow in various research, clinical and educational settings.
References
1. Lau YH, Hayward S, Ntoumenopoulos G (2023) An international survey exploring the adoption and utility of diagnostic lung ultrasound by physiotherapists and respiratory therapists in intensive care. j Intensive Care Soc. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 17511 43722 11489 20
2. Hansell L, Milross M, Delaney A, Tian DH, Rajamani A, Ntoumenopoulos G (2022) Barriers and facilitators to achieving competence in lung ultrasound: a survey of physiotherapists following a lung ultrasound training course. Aust Crit Care. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. aucc. 2022. 04. 005
3. Liu K, Yao YL, Wang YX, Wei BL, Li LC, Wang QX et al (2022) A cross-sectional survey on the lung ultrasound training and practice of respiratory therapists in mainland China. BMC Pulm Med 22(1):425. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s12890- 022- 02213-6
4. Sreedharan JK, Karthika M, Alqahtani JS, AlRabeeah SM, Alnasser M, Alqahtani AS et al (2022) Routine application of lung ultrasonography in respiratory care: knowledge, perceptions, and barriers to instigate. Adv Med Educ Pract 13:1395–1406. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2147/ AMEP. S3890 13
5. Hayward S, Smith M, Innes S (2020) Diagnostic thoracic ultrasound imaging—an exploration of respiratory physiotherapists’ interest and use in clinical practice: a national survey. Ultrasound 28(1):14–22. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 17422 71X19 861131
6. Smith MJ, Hayward SA, Innes SM, Miller ASC (2020) Point-of-care lung ultrasound in patients with COVID-19 - a narrative review. Anaesthesia 75(8):1096–1104. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ anae. 15082
7. Chavez MA, Shams N, Ellington LE, Naithani N, Gilman RH, Steinhoff MC et al (2014) Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res 15:50. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ 1465- 9921- 15- 50
8. Qian-Jing H, Yong-Chun S, Liu-Qun J, Shu-Jin G, Hong-Yu L, Cia-Shuang P et al (2014) Diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of pneumonia: bivariate meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 7(1):115–121
9. Grimberg A, Shigueoka DC, Atallah AN, Ajzen S, Iared W (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of sonography for pleural effusion: systematic review. Sao Paulo Med J 128(2):90–95. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1590/ s1516- 31802 01000 02000 09
10. Hansell L, Milross M, Delaney A, Tian DH, Ntoumenopoulos G (2020) Lung ultrasound has greater accuracy than conventional respiratory assessment tools for the diagnosis of pleural effusion, lung consolidation and collapse: a systematic review. J Physiother 67(1):41–48. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jphys. 2020. 12. 002
11. Dubé BP, Dres M (2016) Diaphragm dysfunction: diagnostic approaches and management strategies. J Clin Med 5(12):113. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ jcm51 20113
12. Zambon M, Greco M, Bocchino S, Cabrini L, Beccaria PF, Zangrillo A (2017) Assessment of diaphragmatic dysfunction in the critically ill patient with ultrasound: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 43(1):29–38. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00134- 016- 4524-z
13. Le Neindre A, Philippart F, Luperto M, Wormser J, Morel-Sapene J, Aho SL et al (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of diaphragm ultrasound to predict weaning outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 117:103890. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ijnur stu. 2021. 103890
14. Poddighe D, Van Hollebeke M, Choudhary YQ, Campos DR, Schaeffer MR, Verbakel JY, Hermans G, Gosselink R, Langer D (2024) Accuracy of respiratory muscle assessments to predict weaning outcomes: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis. Crit Care 28(1):70. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s13054- 024- 04823-4
15 Corradi F, Isirdi A, Malacarne P, Santori G, Barbieri G, Romei C et al (2021) UCARE (Ultrasound in critical care and anesthesia research group) low diaphragm muscle mass predicts adverse outcome in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia: an exploratory pilot study. Minerva Anestesiol. 87(4):432–438. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2736/ S0375- 9393. 21. 15129-6
16. Corradi F, Vetrugno L, Orso D, Bove T, Schreiber A, Boero E et al (2021) Diaphragmatic thickening fraction as a potential predictor of response to continuous positive airway pressure ventilation in Covid-19 pneumonia: a single-center pilot study. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 284:103585. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. resp. 2020. 103585
17. Luecke T, Corradi F, Pelosi P (2012) Lung imaging for titration of mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 25(2):131–140. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ ACO. 0b013 e3283 5003fb
18. Corradi F, Brusasco C, Pelosi P (2014) Chest ultrasound in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Curr Opin Crit Care 20(1):98–103. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ MCC. 00000 00000 000042
19. Whittaker JL, Ellis R, Hodges PW, O’Sullivan C, Hides J, Fernandez-Carnero S et al (2019) Imaging with ultrasound in physical therapy: what is the PT’s scope of practice? A competency-based educational model and training recommendations. Br J Sports Med 53(23):1447–1453. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1136/ bjspo rts- 2018- 100193
20. Hayward SA, Janssen J (2018) Use of thoracic ultrasound by physiotherapists: a scoping review of the literature. Physiotherapy 104(4):367–375
21. Wormser J, Lebret M, Le Neindre A (2017) L’échographie du diaphragme: principes et intérêts pour le kinésithérapeute. Kinésithérapie, la Revue 17(182):62–70. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. kine. 2016. 11. 009
22. Lewińska A, Shahnazaryan K (2020) The use of diaphragm ultrasonography in pulmonary physiotherapy of COPD patients: a literature review. J Clin Med 9(11):3525. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ jcm91 13525
23. Leech M, Bissett B, Kot M, Ntoumenopoulos G (2015) Lung ultrasound for critical care physiotherapists: a narrative review. Physiother Res Int 20(2):69–76. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ pri. 1607
24. Karthika M, Wong D, Nair SG, Pillai LV, Mathew CS (2019) Lung ultrasound: the emerging role of respiratory therapists. Respir Care 64(2):217–229. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4187/ respc are.0 6179
25. Churchill L, Tronstad O, Mandrusiak A, Waldmann J, Thomas P (2024) The role of lung ultrasound for detecting atelectasis, consolidation, and/or pneumonia in the adult cardiac surgery population: a scoping review of the literature. Aust Crit Care 37(1):193–201. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. aucc. 2023. 08. 002
26. Farrell C, Cooper K, Hayward S, Walker C (2023) Exploring the use of lung ultrasonography to assess cardiac surgery patients: a scoping review. J Diagnostic Med Sonogr 40(1):79–99. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 87564 79323 11985 21
27. Le Neindre A, Mongodi S, Philippart F, Bouhemad B (2016) Thoracic ultrasound: Potential new tool for physiotherapists in respiratory management. A Narrative Rev J Crit Care 31(1):101–109. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jcrc. 2015. 10. 014
28. Lockstone J, Love A, Hung Lau Y, Hansell L, Ntoumenopoulos G (2024) The use of diaphragm and lung ultrasound in acute respiratory physiotherapy practice and the impact on clinical decision-making: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust Crit Care 37(1):176–184. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. aucc. 2023. 10. 001
29. Strike K, Chan AKC, Maly MR, Newman ANL, Solomon P (2022) Physiotherapist performed point of care ultrasonography (POCUS): a scoping review of 209 studies. Physiotherapy. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. physio. 2022. 11. 005
30. Kappel C, Chaudhuri D, Hassall K, Theune S, Sharif S, Alhazzani W et al (2022) Point-of-care ultrasound training for respiratory therapists: a scoping review. Can J Respir Ther 58:28–33. https:// doi. org/ 10. 29390/ cjrt- 2021- 065
31. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK (2010) Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 5(1):1–9. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ 1748- 5908-5- 69
32. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB (2015) Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc 13(3):141–146. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ XEB. 00000 00000 000050
33. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D et al (2018) PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 169(7):467–473. https:// doi. org/ 10. 7326/ M18- 0850
34. Doc Translator. www. onlin edoct ransl ator. com/ en/. Accessed 26th June 2024.
35. The World Bank. The World by income and region. https:// datat opics. world bank. org/ world- devel opment- indic ators/ the- world- by- income- and- region. html. Accessed 26th June 2024.
36. Kruisselbrink R, Chan V, Cibinel GA, Abrahamson S, Goffi A (2017) I-AIM (Indication, acquisition, interpretation, medical decision-making) framework for point of care lung ultrasound. Anesthesiology 127(3):568–582. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ ALN. 00000 00000 001779
37. Tomlin G, Borgetto B (2011) Research pyramid: a new evidence-based practice model for occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther 65(2):189–196. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5014/ ajot. 2011. 000828
38. Smith M, Hayward S, Innes S (2022) A proposed framework for point of care lung ultrasound by respiratory physiotherapists: scope of practice, education, and governance. Ultrasound J 14(1):24. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s13089- 022- 00266-6
39. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP) (2022) Context of physiotherapists using point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in physiotherapy practice. Available via https:// www. csp. org. uk/ system/ files/ publi cation_ files/ PD138_ POCUS Conte xt_ e1_ Apr22_0. pdf. Accessed 26th June 2024.
40. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP) (2022) Practice guidance for physiotherapists using point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in physiotherapy practice. https:// www. csp. org. uk/ system/ files/ publi cation_ files/ PD139_ POCUS Pract iceGu idance_ e1_ Apr22. pdf. Accessed 10th March 2023. Accessed 26 June 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Simon Hayward, Camella Cardinael, Chloe Tait, Michael Reid, Andrew McCarthy (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
