Microneedling: is it still a good treatment for acne scars? A literature review (2020-2024)

Microneedling: is it still a good treatment for acne scars? A literature review (2020-2024)

Authors

Keywords:

acne vulgaris, cicatrix, percutaneous collagen induction

Abstract

Background: Acne is a highly prevalent condition that leads to both psychological distress and physical consequences, such as scarring. Several techniques have been used to treat acne scars, with microneedling (MN) being one of the most prominent methods. MN has been extensively studied for its efficacy and safety.

Aims: To compare MN with other techniques for the treatment of acne scars. Methods: A literature review was conducted on PubMed using the terms “microneedling,” “micro-needling,” “percutaneous collagen induction,” “cicatrix,” “acne vulgaris,” “acne,” and “scar,” focusing on articles published between 2020 and 2024. Relevant studies were selected after screening their title, abstract and full text.

Results: Fifteen articles were selected, all of which assessed the efficacy and safety of MN in treating acne scars compared to other treatment modalities. The results consistently demonstrated that MN alone and combined with other techniques is a safe and effective option for improving acne scars.

Conclusion: In this literature review, several techniques were shown to be effective in improving acne scars, including MN, chemical peels, laser therapy, radiofrequency, and platelet-rich plasma. MN is particularly noted for its safety in individuals with darker skin types, and is well-tolerated and effective for the treatment of acne scars. The studies suggest that combining multiple techniques to enhance skin texture yields better results than a monotherapy treatment.

References

1. Shen YC, Chiu WK, Kang YN, Chen C. Microneedling monotherapy for acne scar: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022; 46(4):1913-1922.

2. Chilicka K, Rusztowicz M, Szyguła R, Nowicka D. Methods for the improvement of acne scars used in dermatology and cosmetology: a review. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(10):2744.

3. Ishfaq F, Shah R, Sharif S, Waqas N, Jamgochian M, Rao B. A comparison of microneedling versus glycolic acid chemical peel for the treatment of acne scarring. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2022; 15(6):48-52.

4. Sitohang IBS, Sirait SAP, Suryanegara J. Microneedling in the treatment of atrophic scars: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Int Wound J. 2021; 18(5):577-585.

5. Casabona G, Alfertshofer MG, Kaye KO et al. Safety and efficacy of microneedling technology in the treatment of acne scars. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021; 20(11):3482-3491.

6. Juhasz MLW, Cohen JL. Microneedling for the treatment of scars: an update for clinicians. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2020; 13:997-1003.

7. Demir G, Aksoy F, Buğdaycı O, Kaptanoğlu AF. Elastography findings in acne scar patients who were treated with microneedling. Int J Dermatol. 2024; 63(3):330-336.

8. El-Domyati M, Moftah NH, Ahmed AM, Ibrahim MR. Evaluation of microneedling depth of penetration in management of atrophic acne scars: a split-face comparative study. Int J Dermatol. 2024; 63(5):632-638.

9. Minutilli E. Microneedling for treatment of acne scars: considerations on the successful management of this aesthetic procedure. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024; 23(3):e79-e80.

10. de Souza LG, Gold MH, Steiner D, Silva MR, Viana de Oliveira G. A simple drug-delivery microneedling technique modality successfully improves linear atrophic scars. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024; 23(3):857-861.

11. Sirithanabadeekul P, Leetrakulwanna V, Suwanchinda A. A novel technique in reducing sebum production and improving atrophic acne scars. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022; 21(11):5872-5879.

12. Pakla-Misiur A, Grochowiec M, Lesiak A, Bednarski IA. Double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing the use of microneedling alone versus chemical peeling alone versus a combination of microneedling and chemical peeling in the treatment of atrophic post-acne scars. An assessment of clinical effectiveness and patients' quality-of-life. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2021; 38(4):629-635.

13. Nobari NN, Tabavar A, Sadeghi S et al. A systematic review of the comparison between needling (RF-needling, meso-needling, and micro-needling) and ablative fractional lasers (CO2, erbium YAG) in the treatment of atrophic and hypertrophic scars. Lasers Med Sci. 2023; 38(1):67.

14. Li H, Jia B, Zhang X. Comparing the efficacy and safety of microneedling and its combination with other treatments in patients with acne scars: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Dermatol Res. 2024; 316(8):505.

15. Lopez Q. Treatment of acne scars with microneedling and chemical reconstruction of scarred skin therapy (cross) using penol/croton oil combination. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024; 23(6):418-422.

Downloads

Published

22-12-2025

How to Cite

1.
Cardoso de Oliveira S, Ramalho Pinheiro S, Costa e Silva S. Microneedling: is it still a good treatment for acne scars? A literature review (2020-2024). Aesthetic Medicine [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 22 [cited 2026 Jan. 20];11(4):15892. Available from: https://www.mattioli1885journals.com/index.php/aestheticmedicine/article/view/15892