One size doesn’t fit all: exploring the influence of body size, age, and sex on right ventricle size measurements

One size doesn’t fit all: exploring the influence of body size, age, and sex on right ventricle size measurements

Authors

  • Yun Wang Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Christopher G. Scott Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Garvan C. Kane Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Sorin V. Pislaru Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Jared G. Bird Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Patricia A. Pellikka Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Vidhu Anand Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System Northwest Wisconsin, 1400 Bellinger Street, Eau Claire, WI, USA

Keywords:

Right ventricle size, Dimensions, Sex differences, Body surface area

Abstract

Background: The assessment of right ventricular (RV) size is an important part of 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Current chamber quantification guidelines provide reference values as unindexed numbers, similar for men and women. We sought to evaluate normal ranges of RV dimensions based on age, sex, body surface area (BSA), and height. Consecutive patients with “normal echocardiogram” between January 2011 and August 2022 at our center were retrospectively included. RV dimensions including diameter at the base and mid-ventricle level, and base-to-apex length were measured.

Results: Of 1389 patients (median 43 years, 53% female) with all three measurements available, the median RV measurements, both unindexed and indexed to BSA, were: basal diameter 35.0 mm (31.0–39.0) and 18.4 mm/m2 (16.5–20.3); mid diameter 28.0 mm and 14.8 mm/m2 (13.1–16.6); RV length 73.0 mm (67.0–78.0) and 37.6 mm/m2 (34.9–40.9). RV dimensions were larger in men than women across all age groups but similar when indexed to BSA (for basal and mid dimensions). RV length was best indexed to height. Our indexed normal values by age and sex were similar to World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography (WASE) cohort.

Conclusions: RV measurements should be indexed to BSA, considering sex and age, to determine RV size and enlargement.

References

1. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16(3):233–270

2. Kawut SM, Lima JA, Barr RG, Chahal H, Jain A, Tandri H et al (2011) Sex and race differences in right ventricular structure and function: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis-right ventricle study. Circulation 123(22):2542–2551

3. Maffessanti F, Muraru D, Esposito R, Gripari P, Ermacora D, Santoro C et al (2013) Age-, body size-, and sex-specific reference values for right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography: a multicenter echocardiographic study in 507 healthy volunteers. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6(5):700–710

4. Addetia K, Miyoshi T, Amuthan V, Citro R, Daimon M, Gutierrez Fajardo P et al (2023) Normal values of three-dimensional right ventricular size and function measurements: results of the world alliance societies of echocardiography study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 36(8):858–866

5. Kou S, Caballero L, Dulgheru R, Voilliot D, De Sousa C, Kacharava G et al (2014) Echocardiographic reference ranges for normal cardiac chamber size: results from the NORRE study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 15(6):680–690

6. Addetia K, Miyoshi T, Citro R, Daimon M, Gutierrez Fajardo P, Kasliwal RR et al (2021) Two-dimensional echocardiographic right ventricular size and systolic function measurements stratified by sex, age, and ethnicity: results of the world alliance of societies of echocardiography study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 34(11):1148–1157

7. Du Bois D, Du Bois EF (1989) A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916. Nutrition 5(5):303–311

8. Sonaglioni A, Nicolosi GL, Trevisan R, Lombardo M, Grasso E, Gensini GF et al (2023) The influence of pectus excavatum on cardiac kinetics and function in otherwise healthy individuals: a systematic review. Int J Cardiol 381:135–144

Downloads

Published

2025-02-24

How to Cite

1.
Wang Y, Scott CG, Kane GC, et al. One size doesn’t fit all: exploring the influence of body size, age, and sex on right ventricle size measurements. Ultrasound J. 2025;17(1):14. Accessed January 30, 2026. https://www.mattioli1885journals.com/index.php/theultrasoundjournal/article/view/18117