Feasibility and clinical value of nurse-led point-of-care ultrasound screening for prethrombotic state in postoperative cardiac ICU patients: a cross-sectional study
Keywords:
Nurse-led POCUS, Prethrombotic state, Cardiac surgical procedures, Interprofessional relations, Critical care nursingAbstract
Background: Postoperative cardiac ICU patients are at increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), yet early identification of prethrombotic state (PTS) remains challenging. Nurse-led point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) offers a non-invasive, real-time tool for vascular screening that may enhance early risk stratification.
Objectives: To determine the prevalence of PTS in postoperative cardiac ICU patients using a nurse-led POCUS protocol, identify associated clinical risk factors, and evaluate the feasibility and clinical value of integrating this screening model into routine nursing care within an interprofessional framework.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 123 adult patients following cardiac surgery. ICU nurses trained in POCUS independently performed bedside color Doppler scans to detect the “blizzard” sign in lower limb veins. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of PTS. The nurse-led POCUS protocol was implemented collaboratively with doctors, who provided image verification and clinical oversight as needed.
Results: The “blizzard” sign was observed in 61.8% of patients, most commonly in the popliteal and posterior tibial veins. Nine patients developed deep vein thrombosis, all of whom had prior severe, diffuse-type “blizzard” signs. Independent predictors of PTS included prolonged bed rest (OR 1.016, P = 0.031), elevated peak platelet count (OR 1.007, P = 0.041), and increased postoperative C-reactive protein levels (OR 1.015, P < 0.001). The nurse-led POCUS protocol was implemented successfully with doctor oversight and demonstrated high feasibility and diagnostic yield.
Conclusion: Nurse-led POCUS is a feasible, non-invasive approach for early identification of PTS in postoperative cardiac ICU patients. Embedding such screening protocols into nursing workflows may support timely thromboprophylaxis, expand nursing roles in advanced assessment, and enhance interprofessional ICU care delivery.
References
1. Khoury H, Lyons R, Sanaiha Y et al (2020) Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in cardiac surgical patients. Ann Thorac Surg 109:1804–1810
2. Du W, Zhao X, Nunno A et al (2020) Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in individuals undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 8:551–557
3. Ahmed A, Koster A, Lance M et al (2024) European guidelines on perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: cardiovascular surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae257
4. McLendon K, Goyal A, Attia M (2025) Deep venous thrombosis risk factors StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL)
5. Falck-Ytter Y, Francis CW, Johanson NA et al (2012) Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients. Chest 141:e278S-e325S
6. Tran QK, Flanagan K, Fairchild M et al (2022) Nurses and efficacy of ultrasound-guided versus traditional venous access: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Emerg Nurs 48:145-158.e1
7. Speranza G, Mischkewitz S, Al-Noor F et al (2025) Value of clinical review for AI-guided deep vein thrombosis diagnosis with ultrasound imaging by non-expert operators. npj Digit Med 8:135
8. Yu FTH, Armstrong JK, Tripette J et al (2011) A local increase in red blood cell aggregation can trigger deep vein thrombosis: evidence based on quantitative cellular ultrasound imaging. J Thromb Haemost 9:481–488
9. Li M, Jin H, Wang Y et al (2013) Value of color Doppler ultrasound in the examination of prethrombotic state. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 93:1607–1610
10. Kermani MS, Dehesh T, Pouradeli S et al (2025) Factors affecting the prolongation of mechanical ventilation in patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg 20:104
11. Schwann TA, Kistler L, Engoren MC et al (2010) Incidence and predictors of postoperative deep vein thrombosis in cardiac surgery in the era of aggressive thromboprophylaxis. Ann Thorac Surg 90:760–768
12. Jannati M, Ardecani AA (2020) Prevention of pulmonary and venous thromboembolism post coronary artery bypass graft surgery - literature review. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 35:368–374
13. Saitoh M, Kudo T, Watanabe T (2024) Incidence of venous thromboembolism after cardiovascular surgery. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 32:206–212
14. Aziz F, Patel M, Ortenzi G et al (2015) Incidence of postoperative deep venous thrombosis is higher among cardiac and vascular surgery patients as compared with general surgery patients. Ann Vasc Surg 29:661–669
15. Jia B, Zhang Y, Ma G (2013) Multivariate regression analysis of Prethrombotic State (PTS) molecular markers for patients with fracture during the perioperative period. ZhongGuo ZhongYi JiZheng 22:11
16. Zheng Y, Wang Y, Liu H (2016) Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the prethrombotic condition of cervical cancer patients after radiotherapy. Acta Acad Med Xuzhou 36(11):727–729
17. Waheed SM, Kudaravalli P, Hotwagner DT (2025) Deep vein thrombosis. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL)
18. Parry SM, Puthucheary ZA (2015) The impact of extended bed rest on the musculoskeletal system in the critical care environment. Extreme Physiol Med 4:16
19. Guedes LP, Oliveira ML, Carvalho GD (2018) Deleterious effects of prolonged bed rest on the body systems of the elderly—a review. Rev Brasileira Geriatr Gerontol 21:499–506
20. Bolliger D, Tanaka KA (2017) Coagulation management strategies in cardiac surgery. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 7:265–272
21. Vazquez-Garza E, Jerjes-Sanchez C, Navarrete A et al (2017) Venous thromboembolism: thrombosis, inflammation, and immunothrombosis for clinicians. J Thromb Thrombolysis 44:377–385
22. Pandolfi A (2005) C-reactive protein: a potential new molecular link between inflammation, thrombosis and vascular cell proliferation? Cardiovasc Res 68:3–4
23. Olson ME, Hornick MG, Stefanski A et al (2023) A biofunctional review of C-reactive protein (CRP) as a mediator of inflammatory and immune responses: differentiating pentameric and modified CRP isoform effects. Front Immunol 14:1264383
24. Dix C, Zeller J, Stevens H et al (2022) C-reactive protein, immunothrombosis and venous thromboembolism. Front Immunol 13:1002652
25. Melnikov I, Kozlov S, Saburova O et al (2023) Monomeric C-reactive protein in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: advances and perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 24:2079
26. Tsai AW, Cushman M, Rosamond WD et al (2002) Coagulation factors, inflammation markers, and venous thromboembolism: the longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology (LITE). Am J Med 113:636–642
27. Ignat’ev IM, Zubarev AR, Gradusov EG et al (2017) Method of preventive ultrasound diagnosis of venous thrombosis. Angiol Sosud Khir 23:35–42
28. Knutsen K, Solbakken R (2025) Utilisation of point-of-care ultrasound by critical care nurses: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 15(6):e100911
29. Totenhofer R, Luck L, Wilkes L (2021) Point of care ultrasound use by registered nurses and nurse practitioners in clinical practice: an integrative review. Collegian 28:456–463
30. Al-Absi DT, Simsekler MCE, Omar MA et al (2024) Evaluation of point-of-care ultrasound training among healthcare providers: a pilot study. Ultrasound J 16:12
31. Zaki HA, Albaroudi B, Shaban EE et al (2024) Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnostics: gleaning insights from point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) techniques in emergencies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound J 16:37
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jingjing Cheng, Lu Liu, Xuemei Tang, Chunlin Xiang, Yiwei Qin, Yi Zhang, Zhenjie Jiang, Xiaoting Zeng, Ying Wu, Xiaoyu Chen, Fengchun Liu, Xiaoxiao Wu, Yiping Wang (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.






