Description of an independently developed quality assessment tool to meet emergency department credentialing and Emergency Ultrasound Fellowship Accreditation Council guidelines
Keywords:
Point-of-care ultrasound, quality assurance, quality improvement, database, middlewareAbstract
Background
Quality assurance (QA) review is essential to any point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) program that credentials emergency clinicians or hosts an Emergency Ultrasound Fellowship Accreditation Council (EUFAC) accredited fellowship. Commercially designed QA solutions exist but may not be accessible to all programs due to budgetary or institution-specific administration constraints.
Objectives
The authors aimed to develop a robust, standalone, HIPAA-compliant POCUS QA database which satisfies both credentialing requirements and EUFAC review goals.
Methods
An indexed, searchable electronic QA database was developed using Google workspace. The database was inspected reviewer disagreement trends that led to feedback at the individual and departmental level and was used to satisfy QA review requirements for ultrasound fellows.
Results
Since deployment of the database in July 2021, 2742 studies have undergone QA review out of approximately 15,000 studies performed (18.3%). Reviewers disagreed with some portion of the interpretation in 848 (24.8%) exams, most commonly abdominal aortic aneurysm evaluation (n = 45 exams, 31.1%) and basic echocardiography (n = 1203 exams, 27.9%). Disagreement was least common for male genitourinary exams (n = 19 exams, 0%) and advanced echocardiograms (n=57, 15.8%), likely reflecting operator experience.
For 209 (7.6%) studies, feedback to the clinicians was warranted and delivered via direct communication. This process has resulted in department-level education in consistently deficient areas.
Conclusion
We present our lightweight, easily reproducible alternative to commercial POCUS QA solutions that has led to targeted feedback and department-level education while also satisfying accreditation requirements.
References
1. Bellamkonda VR, Shokoohi H, Alsaawi A, Ding R, Campbell RL, Liu YT, et al. Ultrasound credentialing in North American emergency department systems with ultrasound fellowships: a cross-sectional survey. Emerg Med J. 2015 Oct;32(10):804–8.
2. Tayal VS, Blaivas M, Foster R. T. Ultrasound Program Management. First. Springer International Publishing; 2018. Accessed May 7, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63143-1
3. Heller MB, Mandavia D, Tayal VS, Cardenas EE, Lambert MJ, Mateer J, et al. Residency Training in Emergency Ultrasound: Fulfilling the Mandate. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2002;9(8):835–9.
4. American College of Emergency Physicians. Ultrasound Guidelines: Emergency, Point-of-care, and Clinical Ultrasound Guidelines in Medicine [Internet]. ACEP; 2023 [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from: https://www.acep.org/siteassets/new-pdfs/policy-statements/ultrasound-guidelines--emergency-point-of-care-and-clinical-ultrasound-guidelines-in-medicine.pdf
5. Clinical Ultrasound Accreditation Program: The Process. Accessed May 7, 2024. https://www.acep.org/cuap/the-process
6. Skitch S, Vlahaki D, Healey A. Quantifying Clinically Meaningful Point-of-Care Ultrasound Interpretation Discrepancies Using an Emergency Department Quality Assurance Program. Cureus. 15(7):e42721.
7. Program Requirements - EUFAC [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Feb 5]. Available from: https://eufacouncil.org/about-accreditation/program-elements/
8. Smalley CM, Fertel BS, Broderick E. Standardizing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Credentialing Across a Large Health Care System. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2020 Aug;46(8):471–6.
9. Lewiss RE, Saul T, Del Rios M. Acquiring credentials in bedside ultrasound: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2013 Aug;3(8):e003502.
10. Gardner TA, Breitbach EK, Limes JE, Connors GR, Berry AR, Longino AA, et al. A Quality Improvement Approach to Modification of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum. ATS Scholar. 2023 Dec;4(4):538–45.
Issue
Section
License
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
How to Cite
