Quantitative Lung Ultrasound Spectroscopy: First Comparison with Gold Standard Computed Tomography Scan and Standard Lung Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Pneumonia versus Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

This is a preview and has not been published.

Quantitative Lung Ultrasound Spectroscopy: First Comparison with Gold Standard Computed Tomography Scan and Standard Lung Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Pneumonia versus Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

Authors

Keywords:

Cardiogenic pulmonary edema, computed tomography, lung ultraound, pneumonia, quantitative lung ultrasound

Abstract

Background: Pneumonia (PNE) and cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) are characterized by reduced air-spaces dimension and edema. Their distinction through gold standard computed tomography (CT) is challenging due to their pattern similarity. Lung Ultrasound (LUS) is a tool for monitoring the progression of lung pathologies. LUS is portable, real-time, and non-ionized; however, standard LUS (S-LUS) relies on the subjective visualization of imaging patterns, leading to poor reproducibility and lack of diagnostic specificity. To enhance LUS diagnostic utility, quantitative LUS (Q-LUS) was developed. Q-LUS quantifies imaging patterns and explores their correlation to different pathophysiological conditions. In literature, vertical artifacts (VA) quantification proved capable of differentiating PNE and CPE, however, this approach was never compared with gold standard.

Methods: We statistically investigate and compare the clinical significance of CT, S-LUS, and Q-LUS, in differentiating PNE and CPE. From a cohort of 55 patients, CT, S-LUS, and Q-LUS data are acquired. CT and S-LUS data of each patient are evaluated to assign a semi-quantiative CT-score and S-LUS-score. Q-LUS radiofrequency data are acquired in multifrequency with convex (2, 3, and 4 MHz) and linear (3, 4, 5, and 6 MHz) probes. VA are manually segmented, quantified into three spectral quantities, and statistically analyzed to extract 15 features for each patient. The diagnostic significance of the scores is tested through Generalized Estimating Equation models.

Results & Conclusions: Results show areas under the curve of 80%, 76%, 70%, and 59% for Q-LUS linear, Q-LUS convex, CT-score, and S-LUS-score, respectively, highlighting Q-LUS as the most significant tool.

References

[1] Matthay, M. et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 5, 18 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-019-0069-0.

[2] Mazzon, E. & Cuzzocrea, S. Role of tnf-alpha in lung tight junction alteration

in mouse model of acute lung inflammation. Respiratory research 8, 75 (2007).

URL https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-8-75.

[3] Brito, R. et al. The balance between the serum levels of il-6 and il-10 cytokines discriminates mild and severe acute pneumonia. BMC Pulmonary Medicine 16, 170 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-016-0324-z.

[4] Ware, L., Fremont, R., Bastarache, J., Calfee, C. & Matthay, M. Determining

the etiology of pulmonary edema by the edema fluid-to-plasma protein ratio.

The European respiratory journal : official journal of the European Society for

Clinical Respiratory Physiology 35, 331–7 (2009). URL https://doi.org/10.1183/

09031936.00098709.

[5] Suciadi, L. et al. Comparing lung ct in covid-19 pneumonia and acute heart

failure: An imaging conundrum. Cureus 13 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.

7759/cureus.15120.

[6] Mento, F. & Demi, L. Dependence of lung ultrasound vertical arti-

facts on frequency, bandwidth, focus and angle of incidence: An in vitro

study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 150, 4075–

4082 (2021). URL https://pubs.aip.org/asa/jasa/article/150/6/4075/993698/

Dependence-of-lung-ultrasound-vertical-artifacts.

[7] Al Deeb, M., Barbic, S., Featherstone, R., Dankoff, J. & Barbic, D. Point-of-

care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema in patients presenting with acute dyspnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 21, 843–852 (2014). URL https://doi.org/10.1111/acem. 12435.

[8] Demi, L. et al. New international guidelines and consensus on the use of lung ultrasound. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 42 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16088.

[9] Mento, F. et al. State of the art in lung ultrasound, shifting from qualitative to quantitative analyses. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 48, 2398–2416 (2022). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562922004823.

[10] Mento, F., Perini, M., Malacarne, C. & Demi, L. Ultrasound multifrequency

strategy to estimate the lung surface roughness, in silico and in vitro results.

Ultrasonics 135, 107143 (2023). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/

article/pii/S0041624X23002196?via%3Dihub.

[11] Perpenti, M. et al. Fully automated quantitative lung ultrasound spectroscopy for the differential diagnosis of lung diseases: The first multicenter in-vivo clinical

study. Computers in Biology and Medicine 200, 111365 (2026). URL https:

//www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482525017196.

[12] Mento, F., Perpenti, M., Barcellona, G., Perrone, T. & Demi, L. Lung ultrasound spectroscopy applied to the differential diagnosis of pulmonary diseases: An incvivo multicenter clinical study. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics,

and Frequency Control 71, 1217–1232 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/

TUFFC.2024.3454956.

[13] Mento, F., Perpenti, M., Barcellona, G., Perrone, T. & Demi, L. Quantitative

lung ultrasound spectroscopy classification performance in differentiating cpe,

pneumonia, and pf, a comparative classifiers’ analysis 1–4 (2024). URL https:

//doi.org/10.1109/UFFC-JS60046.2024.10793564.

[14] Smargiassi, A. et al. Lung ultrasound for covid-19 patchy pneumonia. Journal

of Ultrasound in Medicine 40, 521–528 (2021). URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.

com/doi/abs/10.1002/jum.15428.

[15] Mento, F. et al. On the impact of different lung ultrasound imaging protocols

in the evaluation of patients affected by coronavirus disease 2019. Journal of

Ultrasound in Medicine 40, 2235–2238 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1002/

jum.15580.

[16] Soldati, G. et al. Proposal for international standardization of the use of lung

ultrasound for covid-19 patients; a simple, quantitative, reproducible method.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 39 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.

15285.

[17] Mento, F. et al. Limiting the areas inspected by lung ultrasound leads to an

underestimation of covid-19 patients’ condition. Intensive Care Medicine 47

(2021). URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-021-06407-0.

[18] Mento, F. et al. Deep learning applied to lung ultrasound videos for scoring

covid-19 patients: A multicenter studya). The Journal of the Acoustical Society

of America 149, 3626–3634 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0004855.

[19] Demi, L. et al. Lung ultrasound in covid-19 and post-covid-19 patients, an

evidence-based approach. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 41, 2203–2215

(2022). URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jum.15902.

[20] Tortoli, P. et al. Ula-op: An advanced open platform for ultrasound research. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control (2009).

URL https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1303.

[21] Jalilian, H. et al. Lung ultrasound video scoring using a novel motion-aware

segmentation technique: Toward automated neonatal lus scoring. Computers in

Biology and Medicine 198, 111244 (2025). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/

science/article/pii/S0010482525015975.

[22] Soldati, G., Demi, M., Smargiassi, A., Inchingolo, R. & Demi, L. The role of

ultrasound lung artifacts in the diagnosis of respiratory diseases. Expert Review

of Respiratory Medicine 13, 163–172 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1080/

17476348.2019.1565997.

[23] Mento, F., Soldati, G., Prediletto, R., Demi, M. & Demi, L. Quantitative lung

ultrasound spectroscopy applied to the diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis: first clin-

ical study. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency

Control PP, 1–1 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2020.3012289.

[24] Perpenti, M. et al. A novel empirical wavelet transform approach for classification

of radiofrequency lung ultrasound signals applied to diagnosis of lung diseases

1–4 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/UFFC-JS60046.2024.10793884.

[25] Demi, L., Hoeve, W., van Sloun, R., Soldati, G. & Demi, M. Determination of a

potential quantitative measure of the state of the lung using lung ultrasound spec-

troscopy. Scientific Reports 7 (2017). URL https://www.nature.com/articles/

s41598-017-13078-9.

[26] Perpenti, M. et al. Novel quantitative lung ultrasound spectroscopy approach

for diseases classification 1–4 (2024). URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/

10793543.

[27] Hopewell, S. et al. Consort 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline

for reporting randomised trials. BMJ 389 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1136/

bmj-2024-081124.

[28] Padrao, E. et al. Lung ultrasound findings and algorithms to detect pneumonia: A systematic review and diagnostic testing meta-analysis. Critical care medicine 53 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006818.

[29] Staub, L., Biscaro, R., Kaszubowski, E. & Maurici, R. Lung ultrasound for

the emergency diagnosis of pneumonia, acute heart failure, and exacerbations

of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma in adults: A systematic review

and meta-analysis. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 56 (2018). URL https:

//doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.09.009.

[30] Chiumello, D. et al. Assessment of lung aeration and recruitment by ct scan

and ultrasound in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Critical Care

Medicine 46, 1 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003340.

[31] Akor, E. A. et al. Structural and functional characteristics of healthy and

injured porcine lungs during deflation: a quantitative ct imaging analysis. Jour-

nal of Applied Physiology 138, 1615–1627 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1152/

japplphysiol.00443.2024.

18605

How to Cite

1.
Perpenti M, Balzani E, Mento F, et al. Quantitative Lung Ultrasound Spectroscopy: First Comparison with Gold Standard Computed Tomography Scan and Standard Lung Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Pneumonia versus Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema. Ultrasound J. 2026;18(S1):18605. Accessed April 17, 2026. https://www.mattioli1885journals.com/index.php/theultrasoundjournal/article/view/18605