Main Article Content
Human remains, post-mortem, ethical competence, healthcare, moral competence
Human historical findings of the past represent a precious scientific and cultural source for acquiring knowledge of humankind's evolution.
In Italy, still timidly, albeit with a greater frequency if compared to the past, the ethical reflection is turning its attention over processing the material mentioned above, which dwells in an intermediate position between living and what cannot be deemed living anymore.
The reasons for a specific codification aimed at processing those findings, with the ultimate goal of fostering the spreading of good practices among researchers and those who operate within the cultural heritage field, are miscellaneous. In the search for a balance between anthropologic, ethical, and religious instances evoked by these findings and those on the development of knowledge and scientific research, which those findings can ensure, ethical expertise may furnish the necessary coordinates to question the needed interventions within the area of interest in the view of specific human values.
It is hence necessary to provide in the curricular path of archaeologists, anthropologists, physicians, biologists, museum curators and those working in this particular disciplinary field, a proper ethical education on the handling of these artefacts, which could ensure adequate consideration of the various interests and rights involved and a proper balance between research and respect.
2. Abakare CO. Legal, social and ethical issues in euthanasia. Journal Predestination: Journal of Society and Culture 2021; 1(2):229–40.
3. Martini M, Penco S, Baldelli I, Biolatti B, Ciliberti R. An ethics for the living world: Operation methods of animal ethics committees in Italy. Ann Ist Super Sanità 2015; 51(3):244–7.
4. Alt KW, Al-Ahmad A, Woelber JP. Nutrition and Health in Human Evolution–Past to Present. Nutrients 2022; 14(17):3594.
5. Gorini I, Iorio S, Ciliberti R, Licata M, Armocida G. Olive oil in pharmacological and cosmetic traditions. J Cosmet Dermatol 2019; 18(5):1575–9.
6. Monza F, Licata M. I preparati anatomici nei musei una particolare categoria di beni culturali. Med Secoli 2015; 27(2):615–28.
7. de Tienda Palop L, Currás BX. (2019). The Dignity of the Dead: Ethical Reflections on the Archaeology of Human Remains. Ethical Approaches to Human Remains. K. Squires, D Errickson, N. Márquez-Grant. (Edit by) Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32926-6_2
8. Roberts CA. Ethical challenges of working with archaeological human remains, with a focus on the UK. Ethical approaches to human remains: a global challenge in bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology. Cham: Springer; 2020:133–55.
9. Licata M, Monza F. Ethical issues in paleopathological and anthropological research experiences. Acta Biomed 2017; 88(3):315–8.
10. Capasso MC, Fazio A. La musealizzazione di resti umani mummificati. Museologia Scientifica 2020; 14:98–102.
11. Karjalainen H. Cultural identity and its impact on today’s multicultural organizations. IJCCM 2020; 20(2):249–62.
12. Reimers E. Death and Identity: Graves and Funerals as Cultural Communication. Mortality 1999; 4(2):147–66.
13. Becchi P. Il diritto dei morti. Personaedanno. https://www.personaedanno.it/articolo/il-diritto-dei-morti-paolo-becchi
14. Gire J. How Death Imitates Life: Cultural Influences on Conceptions of Death and Dying. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2014; 6(2). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1120
15. Barilan MY. The Biomedical Use of the Body: Lessons from the History of Human Rights and Dignity. Human Tissue Research, A European Perspective on the Ethical and Legal Challenges. C Lenk et al. (Edit by). Oxford: University Press; 2011:3–14.
16. Malgieri G. R.I.P.: Rest in Privacy or Rest in (Quasi-)Property? Personal Data Protection of Deceased Data Subjects between Theoretical Scenarios and National Solutions. Data Protection and Privacy: The Internet of Bodies. R. Leenes, R. van Brackel, S. Gutwirth, P. De Hert. (Edited by) Brussels: Hart; 2018. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3185249
17. Battistuzzi L, Ciliberti R, Bruno W, Turchetti D, Varesco L, De Stefano F. Communication of clinically useful next-generation sequencing results to at-risk relatives of deceased research participants: Toward active disclosure? Clin Oncol 2013; 31(32):4164–5.
18. Battistuzzi L, Ciliberti R, Forzano F, De Stefano F. Regulating the communication of genetic risk information: The Italian legal approach to questions of confidentiality and disclosure. Clin Genet 2012; 82(3):205–9.
19. Manzini V. Trattato di diritto penale italiano. VI; Torino: Utet; 1962:67
20. Comitato Nazionale di Bioetica. Donazione del corpo post mortem a fini di studio e ricerca, 19 aprile 2013. http://bioetica.governo.it/italiano/documenti/pareri-e-risposte/donazione-del-corpo-post-mortem-a-fini-di-studio-e-ricerca/
21. Baldelli, A. Massaro, S. Penco, A. Bassi, S. Patuzzo, R. Ciliberti. Conscientious objection to animal experimentation in Italian universities. Animals 2017; 7(3):24.
22. Ciliberti R, Martini M, Bonsignore A, Penco S. Break with tradition: donating cadavers for scientiﬁc purposes and reducing the use of sentient beings. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2016; 52(2):261–8.
23. Hoeyer K, Olejaz M. Duty and medical gifting: how it became possible to long for a useful death. Mortality 2020; 25(4): 418–32.
24. Legge 10 febbraio 2020, n.10. Norme in materia di disposizione del proprio corpo e dei tessuti post-mortem a fini di studio, di formazione e di ricerca scientifica. (20G00024). GazzettaUfficiale SG n.55 del 04-03-2020.
25. Winkelmann A. On the way to body donation. Rev Arg de Anat Clin 2018; 10(1): 6–8.
26. Rokade S, Bahetee H. Body donation is the major source of cadavers worldwide. Body donation in India: a review. Int J Res Med Sci. 2013; (3):173–7.
27. Monza F. Esporre i resti umani: un problema, tra ricerca, etica e comunicazione. Il caso britannico. Museologia Scientifica, Memorie 2014; 11:241–4.
28. National Research Ethics Committees. Guidelines for Ethical Research on Human Remains. Given by the National Committee for Research Ethics on Human Remains (Human Remains Committee) in 2022 (4th edition).
29. Alpaslan-Roodenberg S, Anthony D, Babiker H, Bánffy E, et al. Ethics of DNA research on human remains: five globally applicable guidelines. Nature 2021; 599(7883):41–6.
30. Fossheim H. Research on Human Remains: An Ethics of Representativeness. Ethical Approaches to Human Remains: A Global Challenge in Bioarchaeology and Forensic Anthropology, K. Squires D. Errickson, N. Márquez-Grant, N. (Edit by) Cham: Springer; 2019:59–72.
31. Ciliberti R, Monza F, De Stefano F, Licata M. The trial of the skull studied by the founder of Criminal Anthropol- ogy: The war of the Lombroso Museum. J Forensic Leg Med 2018; 59:13–5.
32. Ciliberti R, Armocida G, Licata M. Rebury the “Atavistic Skull” Studied by Lombroso? Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2019; 40(2):136–9.
33. Commissione per l’Etica e l’Integrità nella Ricerca del CNR. Codice di etica e deontologia per i ricercatori che operano nel campo dei beni e delle attività culturali (Revi- sione del 3 ottobre 2019, Prot. n. 0069746/2019). https:// scienceandethics.fondazioneveronesi.it/wp-content/uplo- ads/2017/01/Articoli_Chiodi.pdf
34. Boano R, Grilletto R, Rabino Massa E. Human remains in museums: research, preservation and communication. The experience of Turin University Museum of Anthropology and Etnography. Med Secoli 2013; 25(1):251–65.
35. Licata M, Larentis O, Tesi C, Fusco R, Ciliberti R. Tour- ism in the Time of Coronavirus. Fruition of the “Minor Heritage” through the Development of Bioarchaeological Sites. A Proposal. Heritage 2021; 4:759–74.
36. Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society. Faro 27/10/2005 - https://rm.coe.int/1680083746.