Role and challenges to digital technologies in community health promotion programs in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multiple embedded case study protocol
Keywords:
digital health;, health promotion;, cancer prevention;, multiple case study;, protocol;Abstract
Background and aim: Due to the COVID-19 pandemics, The Italian League Against Cancer (LILT), a national federation of local associations promoting cancer prevention, had to face the challenge to find new ways and technologies to promote health in their territories. This study aims to explore how LILT associations led their health promotion interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic and to understand which interventions had a greater impact, for which population group, and why.
Methods: In this descriptive multiple embedded case study, each case will focus on the activities of a local LILT association and their collaborators on the perception and experience of the use of digital technology for health promotion and prevention, through interviews, observations, and a study of products and artifacts. A general overview of each case study will be provided, along with an introduction of the unit(s) of more in-depth analysis. The logical models that emerge from the analysis of each case will be described by using realist analysis, producing a list of possible CMO configurations (Context; Mechanisms; Outcomes). The final report will consist of a cross-case analysis (a comparison between the different case studies).
Discussion: This multiple case study will help generate a first "theory of the use of digital technology in health promotion in local LILT communities. The observation of what local LILT associations in Italy have done during COVID-19 will help identify new and useful health promotion strategies based on these technologies.
References
Brownson RC, Burke TA, Colditz GA, Samet JM. Reimagining Public Health in the Aftermath of a Pandemic. Am J Public Health. 2020;110(11):1605-1610. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305861
Stang A, Jöckel KH. The Impact of Cancer Screening on All-Cause Mortality. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115(29-30):481-486. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2018.0481
National Cancer Institute’s PROSPR Consortium, Corley DA, Sedki M, et al. Cancer Screening During the Coronavirus Disease-2019 Pandemic: A Perspective From the National Cancer Institute's PROSPR Consortium. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(4):999-1002. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.030 Gastroenterology. 2021 Mar;160(4):999-1002. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.030.
Chen RC, Haynes K, Du S, Barron J, Katz AJ. Association of Cancer Screening Deficit in the United States With the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(6):878-884. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0884
Sartor G, Del Riccio M, Dal Poz I, Bonanni P, Bonaccorsi G. COVID-19 in Italy: Considerations on official data. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;98:188-190. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.060
Ministero della Salute. Chiarimenti Rif. Linee di indirizzo per la rimodulazione dell'attività programmata differibile in corso di emergenza da COVID-19. Nota 8076 del 30 marzo 2020.
Vedel I, Ramaprasad J, Lapointe L. Social Media Strategies for Health Promotion by Nonprofit Organizations: Multiple Case Study Design. J Med Internet Res 2020;22(4):e15586. doi:10.2196/15586
Yin RK. Case study research: Design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2014.
Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report. 2008;13:544–59.
Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, Huby G, Avery A, Sheikh A. The case study approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:100. Published 2011 Jun 27. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1994.
Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2013.
Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2006.
Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1985.
Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45(3):214-222. doi:10.5014/ajot.45.3.214
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Marco Del Riccio, Luigi Costantini, Massimo Guasconi, Giovanna Casella, Alice Fanfani, Claudia Cosma, Paula Mindrican, Guglielmo Bonaccorsi, Elena Corradini, Giovanna Artioli, Leopoldo Sarli, Glenn Laverack, Ermanno Rondini, Gianfranco Martucci
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
How to Cite
