Application of the failure mode, effects and criticality analysis in prison to improve safety and mental health
Keywords:
prison , suicide, risk, mental health, nurseAbstract
Background and aim: Admission to a correctional facility represents a critical phase requiring immediate healthcare attention, with a specific focus on mental health. Inmates show a significantly higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders compared to the general population, and the prison environment may worsen pre-existing conditions or contribute to the onset of new psychological issues. Italian regulations require a clinical assessment at intake, including screening for suicide risk. However, early identification of mental disorders and access to adequate care remain critical challenges.
Materials and Methods: This study analyzed the healthcare intake process in an Italian correctional facility using the Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA). A multidisciplinary working group divided the process into seven operational phases, identifying 34 Failure Modes (FM). Each FM was assigned a Risk Priority Index (RPI) to identify critical areas and define possible improvement strategies.
Results: The most critical phases were "Request for tests and specialist consultations" and "Collection of medical and personal history”. Major contributing factors included organizational inefficiencies, language barriers, delays in psychiatric evaluations, and failure to report psychological symptoms.
Conclusions: Three key corrective actions were identified: implementing standardized checklists, multilingual medical documentation, and staff training in managing psychological distress.
References
1. Legge 26 luglio 1975, n. 354. Norme sull’ordinamento penitenziario e sulla esecuzione delle misure privative e limitative della libertà. [Italian]. (Entry into force: 24/08/1975, Last update: 5/05/2023).
2. Decreto del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri 1 aprile 2008. Modalità e criteri per il trasferimento al Servizio sanitario nazionale delle funzioni sanitarie, dei rapporti di lavoro, delle risorse finanziarie e delle attrezzature e beni strumentali in materia di sanità penitenziaria [Internet]. 2008. Available from: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2008/05/30/08A03777/sg
3. Convention against Torture Initiative (CTI). CTI tool 10: Initial medical assessment of detainees upon admission [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://cti2024.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/CTI-Tool-10-Medical-Assessment-2021-ENG-FINAL.pdf
4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Medicines optimization: The safe and effective use of medicines to enable the best possible outcomes (NG57) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng57
5. Cordasco F, Sacco MA, Scalise C, et al. Management and prevention of suicide risk in prison: Results of a preliminary study on Italian prisoners. Eur Psychiatry. 2023;66(Suppl 1):S1106. doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2351.
6. World Health Organization (WHO). Suicide worldwide in 2019: Global health estimates for the year 2019 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.quotidianosanita.it/allegati/allegato1377340.pdf
7. Fazel S, Hayes AJ, Bartellas K, Clerici M, Trestman R. Mental health of prisoners: Prevalence, adverse outcomes, and interventions. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(9):871–81. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30142-0.
8. Associazione Antigone. Suicidi e autolesionismo in carcere – 18° rapporto sulle condizioni di detenzione [Internet]. n.d. Available from: https://www.rapportoantigone.it/diciottesimo-rapporto-sulle-condizioni-di-detenzione/suicidi-e-autolesionismo-in-carcere/
9. Reason J. Human error: Models and management. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):768–70. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768.
10. Sarkar N. Enhancing patient safety using failure mode and effect criticality analysis: A benchmarking study on selected hospitals. Benchmarking. 2024;31(1):[INCOMPLETE]. doi:10.1108/BIJ-03-2024-0212.
11. Liu HC. Improved FMEA methods for proactive healthcare risk analysis. Singapore: Springer; 2019. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6366-5.
12. Bagnasco A, Tubino B, Piccotti E, et al. Identifying and correcting communication failures among health professionals working in the emergency department. Int Emerg Nurs. 2013;21(3):168–72. doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2012.07.005.
13. Francesconi F, Valgimigli S, Francesconi R, Di Denia P. La mappatura dei rischi clinici in un pronto soccorso mediante l’applicazione del metodo FMEA/FMECA. Scenario. 2014;31(3):25–33. [Italian]. doi:10.4081/scenario.2014.98.
14. Stamatis DH. Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. Milwaukee: Quality Press; 2003.
15. Liu HC, Zhang LJ, Ping YJ, Wang L. Failure mode and effects analysis for proactive healthcare risk evaluation: A systematic literature review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020;26(4):1320–37. doi:10.1111/jep.13317.
16. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491–9. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0810119.
17. Zhong S, Senior M, Yu R, et al. Risk factors for suicide in prisons: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2021;6(3):e164–74. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30233-4.
18. Kent H, Magner-Parsons B, Leckie G, et al. Profiles of vulnerability for suicide and self-harm in UK prisoners: Neurodisability, mood disturbance, substance use, and bullying. PLoS One. 2024;19(1):e0296078. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0296078.
19. Vandewalle J, Van Bos L, Goossens P, et al. The perspectives of adults with suicidal ideation and behavior regarding their interactions with nurses in mental health and emergency services: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;110:103692. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103692.
20. Gur-Arieh S, Mendlovic S, Rozenblum R, Magnezi R. Using failure mode and effect analysis to identify potential failures in a psychiatric hospital emergency department. J Patient Saf. 2023;19(6):362–8. doi:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001127.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Giovanni Gioiello, Andrea Caiazzo, Federico Quagli, Anna Arnone, Felice Curcio, César Ivan Aviles Gonzaléz, Ippolito Notarnicola
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
How to Cite
