Living with motor disability between prejudice and inclusion in today’s society: An observational study
Keywords:
disability, prejudice, inclusion, quality of life, barriers, societyAbstract
Background: In Italy, more than 3 million people live with a disability. Among them, more than half experience motor impairments. Although attention to disability issues has globally increased in recent decades, literature on this topic remains limited. The aim of the study is to gather new information on the quality of life and lived experiences of individuals with motor disabilities, with particular focus on factors that may significantly influence their well-being, such as experiences of discrimination and perceived architectural barriers.
Materials and Methods: An online survey was conducted and distributed through associations representing people with disabilities across the Italian national territory. These associations shared the survey link with their members. Participants were interviewed about their quality of life, problems related to disability, satisfaction with social and health services, and levels of anxiety and depression.
Results: The study results depict a concerning scenario: as the perception of prejudice and architectural barriers increases, quality of life decreases, with depressive symptoms of varying severity. Regarding anxiety symptoms, varying levels were observed in more than half of the respondents (61.8%). Among them, the use of antidepressant and anxiolytic medications increased from 5.55% to 27.3% compared to the period before the onset of disability. A low level of satisfaction emerged regarding employment services, territorial mobility, and accessibility of public spaces.
Conclusions: The findings clearly highlight the need for a holistic approach to individuals living with motor disabilities, one that goes beyond the physical condition and takes into account the fundamental role of psychosocial factors. Equally important is a societal shift in the perception of disability, to ensure full inclusion of individuals in all their complexity.
References
1. Silván-Ferrero P, Recio P, Molero F, Nouvilas-Pallejà E. Psychological quality of life in people with physical disability: the effect of internalized stigma, collective action and resilience. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1802. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051802
2. La Convenzione delle Nazioni Unite sui diritti delle persone con disabilità.
3. Bakula M, Kovacević D, Sarilar M, Palijan T, Kovac M. Quality of life in people with physical disabilities. Coll Antropol. 2011;35:247-53.
4. Programme on mental health. 2012.
5. Detsyk OD, Yukish HY, Tsikhon ZO, Kovalchuk RY, Karpinets IM. Quality of life determinants in persons with disability after muskulosceletal injuries. Wiadomości Lekarskie. 2021;74:1093-8. doi: 10.36740/WLek202105108
6. Malliarou M, Tsionara C, Patsopoulou A, et al. Investigation of factors that affect the quality of life after a stroke. In: 2023. p. 437-42.
7. Dymecka J, Gerymski R, Tataruch R, Bidzan M. Fatigue, physical disability and self-efficacy as predictors of the acceptance of illness and health-related quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:13237. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413237
8. Bella GP, Silveira-Moriyama L, Cliquet A. Pain and quality of life in athletes vs non-athletes with spinal cord injury: observational study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2024;47:181-6. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2253393
9. Kifley A, Geraghty TJ, Arora M, et al. Complex lived experiences and hidden disability after spinal cord injury: a latent profile analysis of the Australian arm of the International Spinal Cord Injury (Aus-InSCI) Community Survey. Disabil Rehabil. 2024;46:4675-86. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2283101
10. La disabilità in Italia. 2009.
11. Won Y. Identification of health characteristics of people with physical disability by applying the PRECEDE model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:15081. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215081
12. Rajati F, Ashtarian H, Salari N, Ghanbari M, Naghibifar Z, Hosseini SY. Quality of life predictors in physically disabled people. J Educ Health Promot. 2018 May 3;7:61. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_115_17.
13. Kagan M, Itzick M, Tal-Katz P. Demographic, psychosocial, and health- and disability-related factors associated with psychological distress among people with physical disabilities. Rehabil Psychol. 2018;63:392-9. doi: 10.1037/rep0000206
14. Kifley A, Arora M, Nunn A, et al. Australian arm of the International Spinal Cord Injury (Aus-InSCI) Community Survey: 3. drivers of quality of life in people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2023;61:185-93. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00845-3
15. Sibbritt D, Bayes J, Peng W, Maguire J, Adams J. Associations between fatigue and disability, depression, health-related hardiness and quality of life in people with stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2022;31:106543. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106543
16. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970.
17. Gil-González I, Martín-Rodríguez A, Conrad R, Pérez-San-Gregorio MÁ. Quality of life in adults with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e041249. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041249
18. Tough H, Siegrist J, Fekete C. Erratum to: social relationships, mental health and wellbeing in physical disability: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:580. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4448-8
19. Pagliano E, Casalino T, Mazzanti S, et al. Being adults with cerebral palsy: results of a multicenter Italian study on quality of life and participation. Neurological Sciences. 2021;42:4543-50. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05063-y
20. Hakbijl-van der Wind AJ, Rohn EJ, Tate DG, et al. The social dimension of quality of life following spinal cord injury or disease: an international ICF-linking study. Spinal Cord. 2024;62:104-9. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00954-7
21. Rubbi I, Lupo R, Lezzi A, et al. The social and professional image of the nurse: results of an online snowball sampling survey among the general population in the post-pandemic period. Nurs Rep. 2023;13:1291-303. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13030109
22. Lupo R, Zaminga M, Carriero M, et al. Eating disorders and related stigma: analysis among a population of Italian nursing students. Acta Biomed. 2020.
23. Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities. Achieving health equity through disability inclusion in the health sector. 2022.
24. Albrecht GL, Devlieger PJ. The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:977-88. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00411-0
25. Girolamo G De, Rucci P, Scocco P, et al. Quality of life assessment: validation of the Italian version of the WHOQOL-Brief. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2000;9:45-55. doi: 10.1017/S1121189X00007740
26. WHOQOL-BREF: introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment: field trial version. 1996.
27. Jespersen LN, Michelsen SI, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T, Svensson MK, Holstein BE, Due P. Living with a disability: a qualitative study of associations between social relations, social participation and quality of life. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41:1275-86. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1424949
28. Charfi N, Trabelsi S, Turki M, et al. Impact du handicap physique et des troubles émotionnels concomitants sur la qualité de vie en post-AVC. Encephale. 2017;43:429-34. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.05.014
29. Conoscere il mondo della disabilità. 2019.
30. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Psychological Corporation; 1996.
31. De Nunzio G, Conte L, Lupo R, et al. A new Berlin questionnaire simplified by machine learning techniques in a population of Italian healthcare workers to highlight the suspicion of obstructive sleep apnea. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.866822
32. Lupo R, Zacchino S, Caldararo C, et al. The use of electronical devices and relative levels of nomophobia within a group of Italian nurses: an observational study. Epidemiol Biostat Public Health. 2022;17. doi: 10.2427/13272
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Roberto Lupo, Elsa Vitale, Giovanna Artioli, Federico Cucci, Ludovica Panzanaro, Antonio Calabrò, Chiara Carriero, Stefano Botti, Annunziata Barletta, Maria Rosaria Tumolo, Donato Cascio, Giorgio De Nunzio, Ivan Rubbi, Giulia Maggio, Luana Conte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
How to Cite
