From single risks to cumulative burden: Determinants of cholelithiasis in young adults

From single risks to cumulative burden: Determinants of cholelithiasis in young adults

Authors

  • Safrina Dwiyunarti Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8020-8780
  • Rini R Bachtiar Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Himawan Sanusi Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Sudirman Katu Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Arifin Seweng Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia

Keywords:

cholelithiasis, young adults, cumulative risk burden, obesity, metabolic risk

Abstract

Background and aim: Cholelithiasis has traditionally been considered a disease of older adults; however, its incidence among young adults is increasing worldwide. Most previous studies have focused on isolated risk factors, despite growing evidence that gallstone formation is a multifactorial process involving the accumulation of multiple modest risk factors. This study aimed to evaluate the association between cumulative exposure to selected metabolic and demographic risk factors and the presence of cholelithiasis among young adults in a Southeast Asian population. Methods: A hospital-based case–control study was conducted among adults aged 18–39 years at a tertiary referral center in Indonesia. A total of 141 participants were included (47 cases with cholelithiasis and 94 controls). Cholelithiasis was confirmed by abdominal ultrasonography or computed tomography. Independent variables included sex, body mass index (BMI), lipid profile, total bilirubin, physical activity, and a cumulative risk burden score constructed from multiple concurrent risk factors. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. Results: Female sex (adjusted OR 2.67; 95% CI 1.12–6.35) and obesity (adjusted OR 2.81; 95% CI 1.08–7.32) were independently associated with cholelithiasis. Individual metabolic parameters were not significant when analyzed separately. In contrast, participants with more than four concurrent risk factors had a substantially higher likelihood of cholelithiasis (adjusted OR 4.50; 95% CI 1.43–14.19), indicating a pattern of risk accumulation when multiple modest risk factors coexist rather than evidence of a biological threshold or synergistic effect. Conclusions: Young-onset cholelithiasis appears to be associated with the cumulative burden of multiple modest risk factors rather than any single dominant determinant. Quantifying cumulative risk burden may offer an exploratory framework for early risk stratification and prevention in metabolically transitioning populations.

 

Key words: cholelithiasis; young adults; cumulative risk burden; obesity; metabolic risk

References

1. Lammert F, Gurusamy K, Ko CW, et al. Gallstones. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16024. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.24

2. Portincasa P, Molina-Molina E, Garruti G, Wang DQ-H. Critical care aspects of gallstone disease. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2019;5(1):6–18. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2019-0003

3. Di Ciaula A, Wang DQ-H, Portincasa P. An update on the pathogenesis of cholesterol gallstone disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2021;37(2):99–105. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000423

4. Aune D, Norat T, Vatten LJ. Body mass index, abdominal fatness and the risk of gallbladder disease. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30(9):1009-1019. doi:10.1007/s10654-015-0081-y. PMID:26374741.

5. GBD 2021 Adult BMI Collaborators. Global, regional, and national prevalence of adult overweight and obesity, 1990–2021, with forecasts to 2050: a forecasting study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2025;405:813-838. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00355-1.

6. Sarin SK, Kumar M, Eslam M, et al. Liver diseases in the Asia-Pacific region: a Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Commission. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30342-5.

7. Wang X, Yu W, Jiang G, et al. Global epidemiology of gallstones in the 21st century: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;22(2):1586–1595. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.01.051.

8. Gu LG, Zheng YM, Xu C, et al. Analysis of the pathogenesis and risk factors of gallstone disease. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023;61(5):389-394. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20220927-00410. PMID:36987673.

9. Arida AU, Ruhl CE. Burden of gallstone disease in the United States population: prepandemic rates and trends. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024;16(4):1130–1148. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i4.1130.

10. Gutt C, Schläfer S, Lammert F. The treatment of gallstone disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117(9):148–158. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0148.

Downloads

Published

26-06-2026

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

How to Cite

1.
Dwiyunarti S, Bachtiar RR, Sanusi H, Katu S, Seweng A. From single risks to cumulative burden: Determinants of cholelithiasis in young adults. Acta Biomed. 2026;97(3):18588. doi:10.23750/abm.2026.18588