Main Article Content
THR, ceramic, fracture, squeaking
Background and aim of the work: Ceramic on ceramic bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty are rising in number with the purpose of reducing debris osteolysis in young patients. New generation ceramics drastically reduced the well known problem of liner’s fracture associated with this material but this still represents a complication. Methods: We present the only two cases of acetabular liner fracture we had in our department, on a total of 252 patients, since we use CoC bearing surfaces in THR (2005-2019) analyzing symptoms and causes of this complication. Review of recent literature focused on symptoms and causes of liners fracture, well matched our cases. Results: In line with the analysis of literature, the major cause of liner fracture is neck-cup impingement resulting in the “edge-loading” effect, followed by other factors like prosthesis design, traumas and patient weight. From data also emerge the role of acoustic phenomena (e.g. squeaking) and CT scan in the diagnostic process. Conclusions: Last generation ceramics should be used in CoC THR, implant malposition and prosthesis design have a dominant role in liner fracture, squeaking should always be investigated. CT scan have an important role in diagnosis. Implant revision with substitution of the bearing surfaces is mandatory in case of fracture or impending fracture signs.
2) Willert, H. G., Bertram, H., & Buchhorn, G. H. Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip: the role of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 1990; 258, 95-107.
3) Skinner, H. B. Ceramic bearing surfaces. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 1999; 369, 83-91.
4) Massin, P., Lopes, R., Masson, B., Mainard, D., & Hip, F. Does Biolox® Delta ceramic reduce the rate of component fractures in total hip replacement?. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 100(6), 2014; S317-S321.
5) Ha, Y. C., Kim, S. Y., Kim, H. J., Yoo, J. J., & Koo, K. H. Ceramic liner fracture after cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 2007; 458, 106-110.
6) Park, Y. S., Hwang, S. K., Choy, W. S., Kim, Y. S., Moon, Y. W., & Lim, S. J. Ceramic failure after total hip arthroplasty with an alumina-on-alumina bearing. JBJS, 88(4), 2006; 780-787.
7) Steinhoff, A., Hakim, V., Walker, R. H., Colwell, C. W., & Copp, S. N. Ceramic liner fracture and impingement in total hip arthroplasty. HSS Journal®, 11(1), 2015; 50-55.
8) Min, B. W., Song, K. S., Kang, C. H., Bae, K. C., Won, Y. Y., & Lee, K. Y. Delayed fracture of a ceramic insert with modern ceramic total hip replacement. The Journal of arthroplasty, 2007; 22(1), 136-139.
9) D'Antonio, J., Capello, W., Manley, M., & Bierbaum, B. New experience with alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 2002; 17(4), 390-397.
10) Nevelos, J., Ingham, E., Doyle, C., Streicher, R., Nevelos, A., Walter, W., & Fisher, J. Microseparation of the centers of alumina-alumina artificial hip joints during simulator testing produces clinically relevant wear rates and patterns. The Journal of arthroplasty, 2000; 15(6), 793-795.
11) Elkins, J. M., Pedersen, D. R., Callaghan, J. J., & Brown, T. D. Fracture propagation propensity of ceramic liners during impingement-subluxation: a finite element exploration. The Journal of arthroplasty, 2012; 27(4), 520-526.
12) Toni, A., Traina, F., Stea, S., Sudanese, A., Visentin, M., & Bordini, B. Early diagnosis of ceramic liner fracture: guidelines based on a 12-year clinical experience with 3710 modern ceramic prostheses. 2006; In Exhibited at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (pp. 22-24).