Are dispositional hope levels in athletes a predictor of athletic mental energy?

Main Article Content

Dogukan Batur Alp Gulsen
Mehmet Emre Eryucel
Bulent Turna
Mustafa Yildiz
Sema Eryucel

Keywords

Athletic Mental Energy, Dispositional Hope, Athlete

Abstract

Study Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the correlation between physical activity and mood responses of sports sciences students. 371 female students (age: 21.89 ± 4.33) and 277 male students (age: 22.45 ± 5.44) - 648 in total – participated in the study. Methods: The personal information form developed by the researcher, International Physical Activity Scale (IPAQ) short form for activity levels, and the Brunel Mood Scale for mood responses were used in this study. Results: Findings of the study suggest that males are physically more active and feel more vigorous than females whereas females are physically more inactive than males and experience their negative mood responses more profoundly compared to males. When we analyse physical activity levels and mood responses, we figured out a negative correlation between physical activity levels and negative mood responses. We have also found out a positive relationship between vigorous mood and physical activity levels. Conclusion: Physical activity level of females is lower than that of males, which can be attributed to   females experience negative feelings more profoundly. We can also state that males participate in highly intensive exercises more frequently than females do while the increase in their positive mood responses is also higher than that in females. We can suggest that students feel better as the physical activity level goes up and the decrease in physical activity levels of female students will have a negative effect on their lives due to its repercussions on their moods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 113 | PDF Downloads 52

References

1. Ari C, Ulun C, Yarayan YE , Dursun M, Bozkurt TM, Üstün ÜD. Mindfulness, healthy life skills and life satisfaction in varsity athletes and university students. Progress in Nutrition 2020; 22.
2. Mutlu TO, Öntürk Y, Zorba E, Karanfil AY, Yıldız M, Kartal R. Analysis on some superstitious behaviors of üniversity students engaging in tennis. Batman University Journal of Life Sciences 2016; 6(1): 317-330.
3. Öntürk Y, Efek E, Yılıdz M. Investigating the psychological resilience of students in sports sciences faculty. International Journal of Educational Methodology 2020; 6(2): 393-403.
4. Tarhan S, Bacanlı H. Sürekli umut ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being 2015; 3(1): 1-14.
5. Kandemir F, Karaca F. Karaca-Kandemir Umut ölçeği. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 2016; 9: 7-34.
6. Edwards LM. Hope. In SJ Lopez (Ed.). The encyclopedia of positive psychology. United Kingdom: Willey-Blackwell 2009: 487-491.
7. Snyder CR, Harris C, Anderson JR, Holleran SA, Irving LM, Sigmon ST, Yoshinobu L, Gibb J, Langelle C, Harney P. The Will and Ways: Development and validation of an ı̇ndividual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991; 60 (4): 570-585.
8. Snyder CR. Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry 2002; 13(4): 249–275.
9. Yıldız AB, Yarayan YE, Yılmaz B, Kuan G. Atletik zihinsel enerji ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması ve psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 2020; 18(3): 108-119.
10. Nideffer R. Athletes’ guide to mental training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1985.
11. Suinn R. Seven steps to peak performance. Hans Huber: Toronto; 1986.
12. Lu FJ, Gill DL, Yang C, Lee PF, Chiu YH, Hsu YW, Kuan G. Measuring athletic mental energy (AME): instrument development and validation. Frontiers In Psychology 2018; 9: 2363.
13. Karasar N. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Nobel Yayınevi. Ankara; 2012.
14. Snyder CR, LaPointe AB, Crowson JJ, Jr. and Early S. Preferences of highand low-hope people for self-referential ı̇nput. Cognition & Emotion 1998; 12(6): 807–823.
15. Ryu E. Effects of skewness and kurtosis on normal-theory based maximum likelihood test statistic in multilevel structural equation modeling. Behavior Research Methods 2011; 43(4): 1066-1074.
16. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics, 6th Edn. Northridge. CA: California State University; 2013.
17. Çokluk ÖS, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk S. Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: spss ve lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık; 2012.
18. Lykken DT. Mental energy. Intelligence 2005; 33(4): 331-335.
19. Miller JF. “Hope: A Construct Central to Nursing”, Nursing Forum 2007; 42(1): 12-19.
20. Tsukasa K, Snyder CR. The relationship between hope and subjective well-being: Reliability and validity of the dispositional hope scale, Japanese version. Japanese Journal of Psychology 2005; 76(3): 227-234.
21. Kocaman EN. Bir grup yetişkinde umut ve psikolojik iyi oluş arasındaki ilişkinin farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi (Master's thesis, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı); 2019
22. Gallagher MW, Lopez SJ. Curiosity and well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology 2007; 2(4):236-248
23. Bailey TC, Snyder CR. Satisfaction with life and hope: a look at age and marital status. The Psychological Record 2007; 57: 233-240.
24. Cole BP. Correlations between trait and academic measure of hope and the ınventory on learning climate and student well-being (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT); 2008.
25. Frankl VE. İnsanın anlam arayışı (7.basım). (çev. S. Budak). Ankara: Öteki; 2000.
26. Atik G, Atik EZ. Lise öğrencilerinin umut düzeylerinin yordanması: Akademik Oöz- yeterlik ve problem çözmenin rolü. Tedmem 2017; 42(190).
27. Akçay V. Pozitif psikolojik sermayenin kişisel değerler bakımından iş tatminine etkisi ve bir araştırma. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü 2011.
28. Erkuş A. Afacan-Fındıklı M. Psikolojik sermayenin iş tatmini, iş performansı ve ı̇şten ayrılma niyeti üzerindeki etkisine yönelik bir araştırma. Journal of the School of Business Administration 2013;42(2): 302-318.
29. Kemer G, Atik K. Kırsal ve il merkezinde yaşayan lise öğrencilerinin umut düzeylerinin aileden algılanan sosyal destek düzeyine göre karşılaştırılması. M.Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 2005; 21:161-168.
30. Ulukan M. Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin fiziksel aktiviteye katılım motivasyonları ve sürekli umut düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 2020; 3(1): 202-218. DOI: 10.38021/asbid.752630
31. Bahadır Z, Certel Z, Erdoğan Ç, Yerlisu Lapa T. Rekreasyon bölümü öğrencilerinin kişilik özelliklerinin umut düzeyine etkisi . SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 2020; 18(4): 54-64 . DOI: 10.33689/spormetre.667672
32. Yıldız AB, Dogu GA, Buyukakgul SP, Yilmaz CY. The relationship between athletic mental energy and eating behaviors. Progress in Nutrition 2020; 22.
33. Chiou SS, Hsu Y, Chiu YH, Chou CC, Gill DL, Lu FJ. Seeking positive strengths in buffering athletes’ life stress–burnout relationship: The moderating roles of athletic mental energy. Frontiers in psychology 2020;10:3007.
34. İlhan A. The relationship between athletic mental energy and eating behaviors in tennis players. Progress in Nutrition 2020; 22.
35. Atik G, Kemer G. Çocuklarda Umut ölçeği’nin psikometrik özellikleri: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. İlköğretim Online 2009; 8(2): 379-390.
36. Padilla-Walker LM, Hardy SA, Christensen KJ. Adolescent hope as a mediator between parent-child connectedness and adolescent outcomes. Journal of Early Adolescence 2011; 31(6): 853-879.

Most read articles by the same author(s)