War-related disability: Ancient or recent history?

Main Article Content

Rosagemma Ciliberti
Stefano Alice
Alessandro Bonsignore

Keywords

Roman army, missio causaria, mission honesta, war-related disability, war, disabled soldiers

Abstract

This article examines the significance and evolution of war-related disability throughout Italy's history. The concept of war-related disability has antique roots, with references dating back to ancient Rome, where severely wounded war veterans were entitled to social and financial assistance for their reintegration into civilian life through the "missio causaria" system. The First World War marked a turning point in the history of war-related disability. With the introduction of new weapons and military technologies, the number of injured and disabled soldiers reached unprecedented proportions. The post-war challenges called for a more organized and systematic approach to create specific assistance and rehabilitation structures for veterans.


The Second World War and subsequent conflicts further underscored the attention given to the issues of war-related disability. Countries around the world sought to provide medical care, rehabilitation, and psychological support to disabled veterans, although often with inequalities and gaps. Despite progress made, the recognition of disabled veterans' rights and their full inclusion in society remain crucial objectives.


 

Abstract 93 | PDF Downloads 166

References

1. Dalla Torre UP. Storicizzare la disabilità: l'esperienza dei mutilati di guerra italiani e la costruzione di una nuova identità. Welfare e Ergonomia 2021; VIII(2):15–25.
2. Pironti P. Warfare to Welfare: World War I and the Development of Social Legislation in Italy. Historical Social Research 2020; 45 (2):187–216.
3. Stagni SB, Tomba P, Vigano A, Zati A, Benedetti MG. The First World War drives rehabilitation toward the modern concepts of disability and participation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2015; 51(3):331–6.
4. Tabanelli M. I valetudinari in Roma antica [Valetudinaria in ancient Rome]. Minerva Med 1956; 13;47(47):1046–53.
5. Karabatos I, Tsagkaris C, Kalachanis K. All roads lead to Rome: Aspects of public health in ancient Rome. Le Infezioni in Medicina 2021; 3:488–91.
6. Goldsworthy AK. The Roman Army at War, 100 BC-AD 200. Oxford - N.Y: Clarendon Press; 1998fgfgvbc.
7. Fernández Ferriol C, Ferriol Rodríguez MR, Fleites CJ. Roma: imperio, cultura y medicina. Med cult Acta Médica del Centro 2018;12(2):228–34.
8. Van Lommel K. The recognition of roman soldiers' mental impairment. Acta Class 2013; 56:155–84.
9. Dig. Digest of Justinian: Liber XLIX, 16, 3, 3 a.
10. Boyanov I. Two Fragments from Military Diplomas in Yambol Museum. Archaeol Bulg 2007; XI(3):69–74.
11. Phang SE. The Families of Roman Soldiers (First and Second Centuries A.D.): Culture, Law, and Practice. J Fam Hist 2002; 27(4):352–73.
12. Phang SE. Roman Military Service: Ideologies of Discipline in the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
13. Jung JH. Die Rechtstellung der römischen Soldaten: Ihre Entwicklung von den Anfängen Roms bis auf Diokletian. Band 14 Recht. Hildegard Temporini (Edit by). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter; 1982:882–1014.
14. Davies RW. Service in the Roman Army. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 1989.
15. Watson GR. The Roman Soldier, London: Cornell University Press; 1969.
16. Van Lommel K. The Terminology of the Medical Discharge and an Identity Shift among the Roman Disabled Veterans. AHB 2013;27:65–74
17. Thomas JD, Davies RW. A New Military Strength Report on Papyrus, JRS 1977; 67:51–4.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>