Main Article Content
Dixon, knee MRI, low-field MR, SPED
Background and aim: Recently, there has been a growing interest in the use of Dixon sequence for knee MRI in order to save time spent on the scanner, and improving diagnostic utility. Our purpose was to compare the diagnostic performance of Dixon sequence on low-field MRI with the proton-density sequence on high-field MRI. Methods: This prospective study included 40 patients who underwent 0.25T knee MRI, using the routine protocol with the addition of a sagittal 4-point Dixon sequence (SPED), and an additional sequence on 1.5T scanner, consisting in a fat-suppressed proton-density fast-spin-echo (FS PD-FSE). Two radiologists independently examined the images, evaluating the anatomic identification score and diagnostic performances of the two sequences. Interreader agreement was evaluated using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Final population counted 34 patients (36 knee MR images) with a mean age of 52.9 years (range, 18–75 years). Interreader agreement was very high except for cartilage injuries at medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau (ICC SPED: 0.757, ICC FS PD-FSE: 0.746), even if not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in mean signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), artifacts presence and diagnostic confidence between SPED and PD-FS sequence. Conclusions: Dixon sequences on low-field scanner have a comparable diagnostic accuracy to PD-FS sequence obtained on a high field scanner for knee MR imaging. (www.actabiomedica.it)
2. Zappia M, Castagna A, Barile A, Chianca V, Brunese L, Pouliart N. Imaging of the coracoglenoid ligament: a third ligament in the rotator interval of the shoulder. Skeletal Radiol 2017; 46: 1101-11.
3. Salvati F, Rossi F, Limbucci N, Pistoia ML, Barile A, Masciocchi C. Mucoid metaplastic-degeneration of anterior cruciate ligament. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2008; 48: 483-7.
4. Masciocchi C, Lanni G, Conti L, et al. Soft-tissue inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) of the limbs: potential and limits of diagnostic imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2012; 41: 643-9.
5. Mariani S, La Marra A, Arrigoni F, et al. Dynamic measurement of patello-femoral joint alignment using weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI). Eur J Radiol 2015; 84: 2571-8.
6. Di Pietto F, Chianca V, de Ritis R, et al. Postoperative imaging in arthroscopic hip surgery. Musculoskelet Surg 2017; 101: 43-49.
7. Chianca V, Albano D, Messina C, et al. Rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy: from diagnosis to treatment. Acta Biomed 2018; 89: 186-96.
8. Bruno F, Barile A, Arrigoni F, et al. Weight-bearing MRI of the knee: a review of advantages and limits. Acta Biomed 2018; 89: 78-88.
9. Bruno F, Arrigoni F, Palumbo P, et al. New advances in MRI diagnosis of degenerative osteoarthropathy of the peripheral joints. Radiol Med 2019; 124: 1121-27.
10. Bruno F, Arrigoni F, Palumbo P, et al. The Acutely Injured Wrist. Radiol Clin North Am 2019; 57: 943-55.
11. Barile A, Regis G, Masi R, et al. Musculoskeletal tumours: preliminary experience with perfusion MRI. Radiol Med 2007; 112: 550-61.
12. Gentili F, Cantarini L, Fabbroni M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints in SpA: with or without intravenous contrast media? A preliminary report. Radiol Med 2019; 124: 1142-50.
13. Silvestri E, Barile A, Albano D, et al. Interventional therapeutic procedures in the musculoskeletal system: an Italian Survey by the Italian College of Musculoskeletal Radiology. Radiol Med 2018; 123: 314-21.
14. Zappia M, Reginelli A, Russo A, et al. Long head of the biceps tendon and rotator interval. Musculoskelet Surg 2013; 97 Suppl 2: S99-108.
15. Piccolo CL, Galluzzo M, Trinci M, et al. Lower Limbs Trauma in Pediatrics. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2017; 21: 175-83.
16. Piccolo CL, Galluzzo M, Ianniello S, et al. Pediatric musculoskeletal injuries: role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Musculoskelet Surg 2017; 101: 85-102.
17. Marchesoni A, D'Angelo S, Anzidei M, et al. Radiologist-rheumatologist multidisciplinary approach in the management of axial spondyloarthritis: a Delphi consensus statement. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2019; 37: 575-84.
18. Corsini F, Marchetto G, Candeo F, al e. Magnetic resonance study of femorotibial chondropathy with T2* Map sequences. J Radiol Rev 2020; 7: 12-20.
19. Acanfora C, Bruno F, Palumbo P, et al. Diagnostic and interventional radiology fundamentals of synovial pathology. Acta Biomed 2020; 91: 107-15.
20. Bruno F, Arrigoni F, Mariani S, et al. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of soft tissue tumors: techniques and applications. Radiol Med 2019; 124: 243-52.
21. Bruno F, Palumbo P, Arrigoni F, et al. Advanced diagnostic imaging and intervention in tendon diseases. Acta Biomed 2020; 91: 98-106.
22. Cobianchi Bellisari F, Bruno F, Di Murro I, al e. Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging arthrograph in femoro-acetabular impingement: diagnostic features and retrospective epidemiological evaluation of 4-year experience in a single center. J Radiol Rev 2020; 7: 357-66.
23. Masciocchi C, Conti L, D’Orazio F, Conchiglia A, Lanni G, Barile A, Errors in musculoskeletal MRI, in: Romano L., Pinto A. (Eds.), Errors in Radiology, Springer Milano2012, pp. 209-17.
24. Ghazinoor S, Crues JV, 3rd, Crowley C. Low-field musculoskeletal MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 234-44.
25. Guerini H, Omoumi P, Guichoux F, et al. Fat Suppression with Dixon Techniques in Musculoskeletal Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Pictorial Review. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2015; 19: 335-47.
26. Bastian-Jordan M, Dhupelia S, McMeniman M, Lanham M, Hislop-Jambrich J. A quality audit of MRI knee exams with the implementation of a novel 2-point DIXON sequence. J Med Radiat Sci 2019; 66: 163-69.
27. Deligianni X, Bar P, Scheffler K, Trattnig S, Bieri O. High-resolution Fourier-encoded sub-millisecond echo time musculoskeletal imaging at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2013; 70: 1434-9.
28. Scarpino M, Lolli F, Lanzo G, et al. Neurophysiology and neuroimaging accurately predict poor neurological outcome within 24 hours after cardiac arrest: The ProNeCA prospective multicentre prognostication study. Resuscitation 2019; 143: 115-23.
29. Rossi A, Bustini M, Prosperini P, et al. Neuromorphological abnormalities in schizophrenic patients with good and poor outcome. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2000; 101: 161-6.
30. D'Orazio F, Splendiani A, Gallucci M. 320-Row Detector Dynamic 4D-CTA for the Assessment of Brain and Spinal Cord Vascular Shunting Malformations. A Technical Note. Neuroradiol J 2014; 27: 710-7.
31. Barile A, Bruno F, Arrigoni F, et al. Emergency and Trauma of the Ankle. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2017; 21: 282-89.
32. Arrigoni F, Bruno F, Zugaro L, et al. Developments in the management of bone metastases with interventional radiology. Acta Biomed 2018; 89: 166-74.
33. Barile A, Quarchioni S, Bruno F, et al. Interventional radiology of the thyroid gland: critical review and state of the art. Gland Surg 2018; 7: 132-46.
34. Cazzato RL, Arrigoni F, Boatta E, et al. Percutaneous management of bone metastases: state of the art, interventional strategies and joint position statement of the Italian College of MSK Radiology (ICoMSKR) and the Italian College of Interventional Radiology (ICIR). Radiol Med 2019; 124: 34-49.
35. Giordano AV, Arrigoni F, Bruno F, et al. Interventional Radiology Management of a Ruptured Lumbar Artery Pseudoaneurysm after Cryoablation and Vertebroplasty of a Lumbar Metastasis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 40: 776-79.
36. Masciocchi C, Arrigoni F, Ferrari F, et al. Uterine fibroid therapy using interventional radiology mini-invasive treatments: current perspective. Med Oncol 2017; 34: 52.
37. Scialpi M, Cappabianca S, Rotondo A, et al. Pulmonary congenital cystic disease in adults. Spiral computed tomography findings with pathologic correlation and management. Radiol Med 2010; 115: 539-50.
38. Falsetti P, Conticini E, Mazzei MA, et al. Power and spectral Doppler ultrasound in suspected active sacroiliitis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as gold standard. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60: 1338-45.
39. Arrigoni F, Izzo A, Bruno F, et al. Could anaesthesia be a key factor for the good outcome of bone ablation procedures? A retrospective analysis of a musculoskeletal interventional centre. Br J Radiol 2021; 94: 20200937.
40. Palumbo P, Bruno F, Arrigoni F, et al. Diagnostic and interventional management of infective spine diseases. Acta Biomed 2020; 91: 125-35.
41. Ruscitti P, Berardicurti O, Iacono D, et al. Parenchymal lung disease in adult onset Still's disease: an emergent marker of disease severity-characterisation and predictive factors from Gruppo Italiano di Ricerca in Reumatologia Clinica e Sperimentale (GIRRCS) cohort of patients. Arthritis Res Ther 2020; 22: 151.
42. Vrooijink SH, Wolters F, Van Eck CF, Fu FH. Measurements of knee morphometrics using MRI and arthroscopy: a comparative study between ACL-injured and non-injured subjects. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 Suppl 1: S12-6.
43. Milewski MD, Sanders TG, Miller MD. MRI-arthroscopy correlation: the knee. Instr Course Lect 2012; 61: 525-37.
44. Liodakis E, Hankemeier S, Jagodzinski M, Meller R, Krettek C, Brand J. The role of preoperative MRI in knee arthroscopy: a retrospective analysis of 2,000 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17: 1102-6.
45. Xix Congresso Nazionale S.I.C.O.O.P. Societa' Italiana Chirurghi Ortopedici Dell'Ospedalita' Privata A, Bruno F, Goderecci R, Barile A, Calvisi V. Comparative evaluation of meniscal pathology: MRI vs arthroscopy. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2019; 33: 9-14.
46. Barile A, Conti L, Lanni G, Calvisi V, Masciocchi C. Evaluation of medial meniscus tears and meniscal stability: weight-bearing MRI vs arthroscopy. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: 633-9.
47. Bruno F, Arrigoni F, Natella R, et al. MR Imaging of the Upper Limb: Pitfalls, Tricks, and Tips. Radiol Clin North Am 2019; 57: 1051-62.
48. Lee YH, Hahn S, Lim D, Suh JS. Articular cartilage grading of the knee: diagnostic performance of fat-suppressed 3D volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition (VISTA) compared with 3D T1 high-resolution isovolumetric examination (THRIVE). Acta Radiol 2017; 58: 190-96.
49. Lokannavar HS, Yang X, Guduru H. Arthroscopic and low-field MRI (0.25 T) evaluation of meniscus and ligaments of painful knee. J Clin Imaging Sci 2012; 2: 24.
50. Panta OB, Neupane NP, Songmen S, Gurung G. Assessment of Knee Joint Injuries with Low Field Strength Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2016; 14: 89-92.
51. Leigheb M, Guzzardi G, Barini M, et al. Role of low field MRI in detecting knee lesions. Acta Biomed 2018; 90: 116-22.
52. Palosaari K, Tervonen O. Post-processing water-fat imaging technique for fat suppression in a low-field MR imaging system, evaluation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. MAGMA 2002; 15: 1-9.
53. Park HJ, Lee SY, Rho MH, et al. Usefulness of the fast spin-echo three-point Dixon (mDixon) image of the knee joint on 3.0-T MRI: comparison with conventional fast spin-echo T2 weighted image. Br J Radiol 2016; 89: 20151074.
54. Park HJ, Lee SY, Choi SH, Hong HP, Choi YJ, Kim MS. Reduced metallic artefacts in 3 T knee MRI using fast spin-echo multi-point Dixon compared to fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequences. Clin Radiol 2017; 72: 996 e1-96 e6.
55. He Q, Weng D, Zhou X, Ni C. Regularized iterative reconstruction for undersampled BLADE and its applications in three-point Dixon water-fat separation. Magn Reson Med 2011; 65: 1314-25.
56. Low RN, Ma J, Panchal N. Fast spin-echo triple-echo Dixon: initial clinical experience with a novel pulse sequence for fat-suppressed T2-weighted abdominal MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: 569-77.
57. Vellet AD, Lee DH, Munk PL, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament tear: prospective evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of middle- and high-field-strength MR imaging at 1.5 and 0.5 T. Radiology 1995; 197: 826-30.