Rescue of traumatized riders in world circuits: a comparison between skidboard vs scoop Exl65 and aluminium scoop stretchers

Main Article Content

Enrico Farabegoli
Alessandro Bellati
Marco Forestan
Massimo Berardi
G. De Feo
Eraldo Berardi

Keywords

Abstract

We compared the following stretchers to identify the better and safer to immobilize a fallen rider on the track. The stretchers were: Northwall’s Innovation Skidboard, Ferno’s Scoop EXL65 and anonymous aluminium scoop stretcher. We performed tests on track with several repetitions on a 25 meters path including asphalt, curb, natural and synthetic grass, and gravel. The Dainese Company supplied a suit and a helmet with sensors equipped to receive data. Dainese engineers processed data too. We timed the performance made by teams of three operators, men and women in different roles. The Skidboard turned out to be the most innovative and secure spine board, because generates less energy than other stretchers and reduces, almost cancels, the harmful consequences of the patient’s fall on the ground. Exl65 generates more spin and longitudinal stresses than Skidboard, especially the cervical spine. Skidboard is faster than other stretchers to complete the fallen rider’s rescue on the track. It is the only spineboard that allows to tie the patient to the stretchers from head to toe, which does not happen with the aluminum scoop and only partially with the Exl65. Skidboard is better than others to rescue fallen and traumatized riders on the tracks quickly and safely.

 

a

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract 111 | PDF Downloads 63