Evaluation of bio-psycho-social frailty in older persons on the territory: the method and the experience of the “Medesano Health House”
Main Article Content
frailty,, prevention, health, social needs
Background and aim of the work: Frailty in older people is a situation of risk of dependency caused by many factors. On this consideration, the Medesano city started a survey on the condition of fragility of people >75 aimed at building a monitoring system for timely interventions on the factors of risk and implementation of measures for preventing dependency. Methods: The survey was conducted jointly by the family doctor and the social worker in the City. The multidimensional assessment considered logistic and housing conditions, disease, medications, basic and instumental acitvities of daily living, neurological and psycological conditions. Results: The survey included 761 older people, with a following definition of condition and levels of frailty both at social (loneliness, lack of supporting network, etc..) and health level (complexity of the regimen, high and / or severe comorbidity) was planned from the beginning as the basis on which developing a continuous in time monitoring program for assessing the frailty, for a early taking in charge by Health and Welfare services, boosting integrated health and welfare interventions and promoting networks of solidarity and sociality. Conclusion: The data seem to confirm that the methodology used is sufficiently adequate to intercept frailty in > 75 years unknown to social services indicating that the monitoring on the functionality of the subjects obtained from the surveys by the General Practitioners could be deemed as a privileged way for a survey on large populations. After the survey was activated continuous monitoring of patients with social and clinical frailty.
2. The Fragile Elder. In: Senin U, Cherubini A, Mecocci P. Elderly patient, geriatric patient, complexity medicine . Edises ed., Naples 2011, 291-311
3. Burchner DM, Wagner EH. Preventing frail healt. Clin Geriatr Med 1992, 8: 1-17
4. Brockelurst JC. The geriatric service ad the day hospital in the United Kingdom. In: Brockelurst JC, Tallis RC, Fillit HM. Textbook of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontoogy, 4th Ed, London 1992
5. Rookwod K, Andrew M, Mitniscki A. A comparison of two approaches to mesuring frailty in elderly people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007, 62: 738-743
6. Minneci C, Mello AM, Mossello E, et al. Comparative study pf four physical performances measures as predictors of death, incident disability, and falls in unselected older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015, 63: 136-141
7. Maggio M, Ceda GP, Ticinesi A, et al. Instrumental and non-instrumental evalutation of 4 meters walking speed in older individuals . PLOSE ONE 2016, 11: 1 -10
8. Markle-Reid M, Browne G. Conceptualizations of frailty in relatrion to older adults . J Adv Nurs 2003, 44: 58-68
9. Armstrong JJ, Stolee P, Hiders JP, et al. Examining three frailty conceptualizations in their ability to predicate negative outcomes for home care clinets. Age Aging 2010, 39:
10. Sourial N, Wolfson C, Bergman H, et al. Correspondence analysis revealed frailty deficiency aggeregate and are multidimensional. J Clin Epidemiol 2010, 63: 647-654
11. Shah S, Cooper B, Maas F. The Barthel Index and ADL Evaluation in Stroke Rehabilitation in Australia, Japan, the UK and the USA. Aust Occup Ther J. 1992, 39:5–13.
12. Lawton MP & Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 1969, 9: 179-186.
13. De Lepeleire J, Iliffe S, Mann E, et al. Frailty: an emerging concept for general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2009, 59:e177-82.
14. Xie B, Larson JL, Gonzalez R, et al. Components and Indicators of Frailty Measures: A Literature Review. J Frailty Aging. 2017, 6:76-82.
15. Cesari M, Calvani R, Marzetti E. Frailty in Older Persons. Clin Geriatr Med. 2017, 33 :293-303