Antegrade intramedullary nailing in proximal humeral fractures: results of 23 cases

Main Article Content

Francesco Pogliacomi
Giovanni Malagutti
Margherita Menozzi
Alessandra Colacicco
Francesco Ceccarelli
Enrico Vaienti
Filippo Calderazzi

Keywords

proximal humerus, fracture, nailing, trauma

Abstract

Introduction: the metaepiphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus represent 5% of all fractures
and mainly affect elderly patients. The type of treatment remain controversial. This retrospective study aimed
to evaluate the clinic and radiographic results of 23 patients affected by two or three fragments fractures of
the proximal humerus with or without metaphyseal extension treated with antegrade intramedullary nailing.
Materials and Methods: all patients were clinically evaluated using the “Constant score” (CS) and individual
satisfaction was assessed with a visual scale (VS). Moreover, the fracture’s healing process and the neck shaft
angle (NSA) were assessed radiographically. Results: the mean follow-up was 72 months (24-120). Clinical
evaluation and individual satisfaction were positive in most cases (mean CS 79,39 and VS 3,17). Worse results
were observed in patients over 65 years. Discussion: among the different surgical options intramedullary nailing ensures good fracture stability and high consolidation rate. The entry point through the rotator cuff is of
main importance as well as proximal nail positioning and choice of the locking screws length. In this study
the functional results of the shoulder are worse in the elderly, who are supposed to have already a degenerated
rotator cuff. Conclusions: antegrade intramedullary nailing should be considered a valid therapeutic option in
this type of fractures. The surgical technique may influence functional results, as consequence of iatrogenic
damage of the rotator cuff.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract 125 | PDF Downloads 58

References

1. Vachtsevanos L, Hayden L, Desai AS, Dramis A. Management of proximal humerus fractures in adults. World J Orthop 2014; 5(5): 685-693.
2. Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72: 365-371.
3. Benazzo, Ceccarelli, Cerulli, Villani, Sasso. Ortopedia e traumatologia. Milano : Monduzzi Editore, 2010.
4. Knowelden J, Buhr AJ, Dunbar O. Incidence of fractures in persons over 35 years of age. A report to the MRC working party on fractures in the elderly. Brit J Prev Soc Med. 1964;18:130–141.
5. Donaldson LJ, Cook A, Thomson RG. Incidence of fractures in a geographically defined population. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990;44(3):241–245.
6. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for coding and Classification ,Fracture and dislocation compendium. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(suppl 1):v–ix,1–154.
7. Bell JE, Leung BC, Spratt KF, et al. Trends and variation in incidence, surgical treatment, and repeat surgery of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(2):121–131.
8. Chu SP, Kelsey JL, Keegan TH, Sternfeld B, Prill M, Quesenberry CP, Sidney S. Risk factors for proximal humerus fracture. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160:360-7 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Rosas S1, Law TY1, Kurowicki J1, Formaini N2, Kalandiak SP3, Levy JC4. Trends in surgical management of proximal humeral fractures in the Medicare population: a nationwide study of records from 2009 to 2012. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Apr;25(4):608-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
10. Plath JE1, Kerschbaum C2, Seebauer T2, Holz R2, Henderson DJH3, Förch S2, Mayr E2. Locking nail versus locking plate for proximal humeral fracture fixation in an elderly population: a prospective randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jan 10;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2399-1.
11. A.A. Frombach et al 2017. Humeral Head Replacement and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fracturesm. DOI: 10.2174/1874325001711011108
12. Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome Score. https://www.physio-pedia.com/Constant-Murley_Shoulder_Outcome_Score#cite_note-mm-2
13. Pogliacomi F., Devecchi A., Costantino C., Vaienti E.Functional long-term outcome of the shoulder after antegrade intramedullary nailing in humeral diaphyseal fractures. Musculoskeletal Surgery 2008; 92(1): 11-6.
14. J.H. Assunção, E.A. Malavolta, R.A. Beraldo, M.E.C. Gracitelli, M. Bordalo-Rodrigues, A.A. Ferreira Neto. Impact of shoulder rotation on neck-shaft angle: A clinical study. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.04.007
15. Jia, X., Chen, Y., Qiang, M., Zhang, K., Li, H., Jiang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Postoperative Evaluation of Reduction Loss in Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Comparison of Plain Radiographs and Computed Tomography. Orthopaedic Surgery, 9(2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12332
16. Lind T, Kroner TK, Jensen J. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1989; 108 (5): 285-7.
17. Jinn Lin. Effectivness of locked nailing for displaced three- part proximal humeral
fractures. The journal of Trauma Injury, Infection, and critical care 2006; 61: 363-74.
18. Lin J, Shen PW, Hou SM. Complications of locked nailing in humeral shaft fractures. J Trauma 2003; 545 (5): 943-9.
19. Szyszkowitz R, Seggl W, Schleifer P, Cundy PJ. Proximal humeral fractures management: techniques and expected results. Clin Orthop 1993; 292: 13-25.
20. Dilisio MF, Nowinski RJ, Hatzidakis AM, Fehringer EV. Intramedullary nailing of the proximal humerus: evolution, technique, and results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25(5):e130–e138. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.016
21. Koval KJ, Gallagher MA, Marsicano JG, Cuomo F, McShinawy A, Zuckerman JD. Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(2):203–207. doi:10.2106/00004623-199702000-00006
22. Rangan, A., Handoll, H., Brealey, S., Jefferson, L., Keding, A., Martin, B. C., … Torgerson, D. (2015). Surgical vs Nonsurgical Treatment of Adults With Displaced Fractures of the Proximal Humerus. JAMA, 313(10), 1037. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.1629
23. Robinson CM, Christie J. The two part proximal humeral fracture: a review of operative
treatment using two techniques. Injury 1993; 24: 123-5.
24. Schippinger G, Szyszkowitz R, Seibert FJ. Current concepts in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture. Curr Orthop 1997; 292: 203-14.
25. N. Lekic et al. (2012). Treatment of two-part proximal humerus fractures: intramedullary nail compared to locked plating.
26. Wong, J., Newman, J.M., Gruson, K.I.. Outcomes of intramedullary nailing
for acute proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review. Journal of Orthopaedics and
Traumatology 2016; 17(2): 113-22.
27. A. Sobel et al. Fixation of a Proximal Humerus Fracture With an Intramedullary Nail. J Orthop Trauma 2017; 31: S47–S49.
28. Riemer BL, Butterfield SL, D’Ambrosia R, Kellam J. Seidel intramedullary nailing of humeral diaphyseal fractures: a preliminary report. Orthopedics 1991; 14: 239-46.
29. De Filippo M., Bertellini A., Pogliacomi F., Sverzellati N., Corradi D., Garlaschi G., Zompatori M. Multidetector computed tomography arthrography of the knee: diagnostic accuracy and indications. Eur J Radiol 2009 May; 70(2): 342-51.

Most read articles by the same author(s)