Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of paranasal sinus mucoceles at a tertiary referral hospital in Southern Vietnam

Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of paranasal sinus mucoceles at a tertiary referral hospital in Southern Vietnam

Authors

  • Anh Bich Tran Otorhinolaryngology Department, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8007-0348
  • Uyen Chi Le Nguyen Otorhinolarygology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Hoang Nam Pham Otorhinolaryngology Department, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Van Anh Hoang Faculty of Medicine, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Gia Huy Truong Faculty of Medicine, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho, Vietnam
  • Duy Hieu Tran Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Cong Huyen Ton Nu Cam Tu Nguyen Head and Neck Surgery Department, ENT Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Keywords:

endoscopic sinus surgery, mucocele, orbital complications, paranasal sinuses, recurrence, surgical outcomes, Vietnam

Abstract

Background and aim: Paranasal sinus mucoceles are increasingly encountered in clinical practice, often presenting with vague and late-stage symptoms. If left untreated, mucoceles can erode adjacent bony structures and compress critical anatomical areas such as the orbit and skull base, leading to serious complications including visual impairment and intracranial involvement. This study aims to describe the clinical and radiological characteristics, microbiological findings, and surgical treatment approaches for paranasal sinus mucoceles.

Methods: A descriptive, retrospective study was conducted on 93 adult patients diagnosed and surgically treated for paranasal sinus mucoceles at Cho Ray Hospital, Vietnam, between January 2018 and July 2023. Clinical data, imaging findings, bacterial culture results, and surgical methods were analyzed.

Results: The mean patient age was 48 years (range: 18–90), with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.12. The fronto-ethmoidal region was the most frequently affected site (32.3%). A previous history of nasal/sinus surgery was noted in 50.5% of cases. Common symptoms included proptosis (32.3%), blurred vision (25.7%), facial pain (60.2%), and nasal obstruction (33.3%). For maxillary sinus mucoceles, 60% underwent combined endoscopic and Caldwell-Luc procedures. Among fronto-ethmoidal cases, 72.0% were managed with endoscopic surgery alone, while 25.8% required a combined external Jacques approach. The recurrence rate was 15.1%, with an average time to recurrence of 2.52 years.

Conclusions: Paranasal sinus mucoceles often present with nonspecific and ocular-related symptoms. Endoscopic surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, though combined approaches are warranted in complex or recurrent cases. Long-term follow-up is essential to detect recurrences early.

References

1. Swain SK, Dubey D. Paranasal Sinus Mucoceles: A Narrative Review. Hamdan Medical Journal. 2023;16(2):69-73. doi: 10.4103/hmj.hmj_93_22.

2. Gokani S, Kumaresan K, Adari S, et al. The Clinical Course of Paranasal Sinus Mucocoeles-A Retrospective Case Series. J Clin Med. 2024;13(2). doi: 10.3390/jcm13020397.

3. Scangas GA, Gudis DA, Kennedy DW. The natural history and clinical characteristics of paranasal sinus mucoceles: a clinical review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3(9):712-7. doi: 10.1002/alr.21178.

4. Swain SK, Panda S. Mucoceles of Paranasal Sinuses. Mustansiriya Med. J. 2022;21(2):124-8. doi: 10.4103/mj.mj_12_22.

5. Obeso S, Llorente JL, Pablo Rodrigo J, Sanchez R, Mancebo G, Suarez C. Paranasal sinuses mucoceles. Our experience in 72 patients. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2009;60(5):332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2009.05.006.

6. Benkhatar H, Khettab I, Sultanik P, Laccourreye O, Bonfils P. Mucocele development after endoscopic sinus surgery for nasal polyposis: A long-term analysis. Ear Nose Throat J. 2018;97(9):284-94. doi: 10.1177/014556131809700918.

7. Devars du Mayne M, Moya-Plana A, Malinvaud D, Laccourreye O, Bonfils P. Sinus mucocele: natural history and long-term recurrence rate. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2012;129(3):125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2011.10.002.

8. Kim YS, Kim K, Lee JG, Yoon JH, Kim CH. Paranasal sinus mucoceles with ophthalmologic manifestations: a 17-year review of 96 cases. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011;25(4):272-5. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3624.

9. Varghese L, Bright RR, Gunturi AVA, Rebekah G, Kurien R. Do Variations in Frontal Recess Anatomy Predispose to Mucocele Formation? Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025;29(1):1-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788002.

10. Capra GG, Carbone PN, Mullin DP. Paranasal sinus mucocele. Head Neck Pathol. 2012;6(3):369-72. doi: 10.1007/s12105-012-0359-2.

11. Ting MYL, Shan M, Gantz O, Zhang-Nunes S, Wrobel B. Optic Neuropathy due to an Ethmoid Mucocele: A Case Report and Literature Review. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2019;10(2):227-34. doi: 10.1159/000501898.

12. Mahfoz TMB, Alnemare AK. Optic neuropathy related to Onodi cell mucocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. AIMS Medical Science. 2021;8(3):203-23. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2021018.

13. Plantier DB, Neto DB, Pinna FR, Voegels RL. Mucocele: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in 46 Operated Patients. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;23(1):88-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668126.

14. Nguyen TN, Le VK, Nguyen QA, Pham MT. Evaluating the characteristic of paranasal sinus mucocele in computed tomography. Vietnamese Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2022(38):58-62. doi: 10.55046/vjrnm.38.168.2020.

15. Marks SC, Latoni JD, Mathog RH. Mucoceles of the maxillary sinus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;117(1):18-21. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59989770200-6.

16. Caylakli F, Yavuz H, Cagici AC, Ozluoglu LN. Endoscopic sinus surgery for maxillary sinus mucoceles. Head Face Med. 2006;2:29. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-2-29.

17. Huang CC, Chen CW, Lee TJ, et al. Transnasal endoscopic marsupialization of postoperative maxillary mucoceles: middle meatal antrostomy versus inferior meatal antrostomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268(11):1583-7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1636-5.

18. Brook I, Frazier EH. The microbiology of mucopyocele. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(10):1771-3. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200110000-00020.

19. Busaba NY, Siegel N, Salman SD. Bacteriology of nontraumatic maxillary sinus mucoceles versus chronic sinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(6):969-71. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200006000-00016.

20. Suzuki M, Matsumoto T, Yokota M, Toyoda K, Nakamura Y. Transnasal inferior meatal antrostomy with a mucosal flap for post-Caldwell-Luc mucoceles in the maxillary sinus. J Laryngol Otol. 2019;133(8):674-7. doi: 10.1017/S0022215119001233.

21. Dhepnorrarat RC, Subramaniam S, Sethi DS. Endoscopic surgery for fronto-ethmoidal mucoceles: a 15-year experience. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147(2):345-50. doi: 10.1177/0194599812441570.

22. Shanbag RD, Pandurangi A, Dinesh R. Mucoceles of Paranasal Sinuses: A Single Centre Experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;74(Suppl 2):1147-52. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02206-z.

Downloads

Published

15-12-2025

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL CLINICAL RESEARCH

How to Cite

1.
Bich Tran A, Chi Le Nguyen U, Nam Pham H, et al. Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of paranasal sinus mucoceles at a tertiary referral hospital in Southern Vietnam. Acta Biomed. 2025;96(6):17444. doi:10.23750/abm.v96i6.17444